Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> MOTION: Laszlo moved that the Board recommend positive findings on 6.12 a-d. <br /> Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> • <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Laszlo moved that the Board recommend positive findings on .6.12 e--f. <br /> Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> • VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: . Laszlo moved that the Board recommend negative findings on 6.24. <br /> • <br /> Shanklin seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: , . . Unanimous. ' <br /> nanimous. ' • <br /> MOTION: Laszlo moved that the Board recommend positive findings'on 6.24 a-d.' <br /> Greenberg seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. V . <br /> MOTION Laslo moved that the Board recommend positive findings on 6.24 e 3-A. <br /> Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: • . Unanimous. <br /> MOTION:• Laszlo moved that the Board recommend positive findings on 6.24f. <br /> seconded the motion. . . <br /> VOTE: . ' , Unanimous. ' - • • . <br /> MOTION: , Greenberg moved that the Board recommended that the general findings <br /> of 8.2.2 are satisfied. . Laszlo seconded the motion. <br /> Pilkey questioned the promotion of the public health, safety, and <br /> welfare given existing traffic on Weaver Dairy and the projected <br /> traffic generation figures. - <br /> Gordon responded there was no evidence to indicate that the project <br /> would push the road over the desired capacity level. <br /> Walters responded the project posed an inconvenience versus danger. <br /> • <br />