Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 02-19-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 11:53:55 AM
Creation date
9/8/2016 12:27:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Laszlo questioned that natural vegetation .constitutes screening. <br /> Smith reviewed the definition of a Class A screen. <br /> • <br /> Walters asked if areas were cleared. Yuhasz felt that the woods <br /> • were not mature, but were also not cleared. <br /> Smith read the minutes of the public hearing on this matter. <br /> Go'rdon inquired how to satisfy the request for later provision with <br /> a condition. Smith raised the issue of applicant accountability <br /> at a later time <br /> Yuhasz asked Smith to show on the site plan where the waiver was <br /> requested. Smith clarified it was at the easternmost property line <br /> of the &ubmittal, the eastern line of Lot B. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Shanklin questioned that if planted, it might have to be torn down, <br /> for later development. Walters suggested it might raise the property <br /> ' value. Laszlo questioned delaying the cost to another developer. <br /> Greenberg noted it was not a common prodecure to approve an "extended" <br /> • condtion. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor the the proposal with all the conditions. <br /> Yuhasz abstained. <br /> (24) 0e. SEDGEWOOD APARTMENTS-PD-2-84 <br /> The Board reviewed Sections 8.6-8.8. <br /> By conscious the Board focused their review on -the revised site plan <br /> submitted to public hearing on December 18, 1984. <br /> The Board discussed building height requirements. Collins clarified <br /> • <br /> • <br /> that. Article 6.2 allows building height variations with additional• <br /> setbacks. • <br /> • • <br /> • . <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.