Orange County NC Website
Maw iticwittia toblklunEs illez4/61 096 <br /> Commissioner Marshall questioned the staff on the justification used to • <br /> support this amendment. . . <br /> Smith responded that the district is one of the two most intensive zoning <br /> districts in the ordinance and that uses of similar impact are permitted in <br /> this district. <br /> . Chair ' Willhoit inquired about. the use of property zoned CC-3 specifically <br /> for car :sales, citing the property located at Watts/Star Point. Smith <br /> responded that, the property could be used for any use permitted in' the CC-3 <br /> district according to the CC-3 district requirements. Assignment of a CC-3 <br /> zoning district classification would requite satisfaction of the application' <br /> criteria for the district. <br /> ' <br /> NOTE: COMMISSIONER WALKER LEFT AT 10:15. ( <br /> Commissioner Marshall asked if there were any other criteria to' be applied <br /> to this use in a CC-3 district.' Smith responded no additional criteria was <br /> proposed. . . . <br /> . <br /> . <br /> . • . Commissioner Marshall asked staff to review the characteristics of the <br /> CC-3 district. ' Smith reviewed the definition ' of the district, its intent . <br /> . - - <br /> statement, the application criteria and the types of uses-permitted in the <br /> district. ' She noted that this use is appropriate in this district, citing the <br /> range of uses permitted currently. . . . <br /> . . <br /> . ' :Commissioner. Marshall inquired about materials staff review, to come to a <br /> decision on these matters. Smith cited Planning Advisory Service Reports and, <br /> other planning research and support data, as well as other . jurisdictions' '. • <br /> ordinances. . . . <br /> . . <br /> • ' . • ' . . <br /> 10. . ZONING munticE TEXT IIMENDMIT-TEMPORARY MOBILE HOMES* <br /> . . <br /> . The staff presentation was made by Susan Smith. . • . <br /> . . <br /> Commissioner Marshall asked if a time limit should be set onthe .construc-. ' <br /> . .. <br /> tion period and presence of the temporary home. . Chair Willhoit concurred. <br /> . Yuhasz expressed concern that given the nature and use of temporary' mobile <br /> homes, a time limit was inappropriate. . . . <br /> Commissioner Marshall expressed concern about safety factors. <br /> : ' • . <br /> . , <br /> - Pearson indicated that except 'for the thirty day removal . .period there <br /> would not be two livable structures on' the same site. He added that the perms <br /> nent'..-or replacement structure would not.be occupiable until a Certificate of <br /> Occupancy is issued and that both the permanent and the temporary structure <br /> must meet the "requirements for issuance of the building permits. Smith <br /> verified' that both structures must comply with applicable requirements. <br /> . • . . . <br /> . . <br /> . . • <br /> 11. 20 _■ ozo ■41 7 . 7 t ,M _ • • . • f Ok. • - <br /> • The 'staff presentation was made by Susan Smith:- - '-- • - • • <br /> No comment on the amendment was,received. . <br /> • The public hearing was adjourned. .- ,.. • : <br /> . . <br /> • . • . . - . • <br /> . . . <br /> LnjatIBTIMEtiT S • . -. <br /> • . <br /> •• . • . <br /> , <br /> . . <br /> The 1oint Public Hearing was adjourned.,-. . <br /> . . <br /> . : .. . . • <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> . . . : <br /> .. / . . . <br /> . . <br /> Don willhoit, Chair <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> Beverly A. Blythe, ClrIc.. .' • :- . . <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> • . . . . . <br /> . . <br /> .' .. . . . <br /> . . . . <br /> , • . • • . <br /> . . . . <br /> • <br /> • . . . <br /> • ' • . • • ' <br /> . • . . <br /> . . <br /> . . <br /> semmaimmmr. . . . <br />