Orange County NC Website
Sid Medlin of Charlotte indicated he also was one of the first residcnte <br /> of Oakdale Mobile Home Park and that it is very nice. He indicated that Fir. <br /> Stephens sets firm rules and deals with all park problems himself. He added <br /> that he knows there is a need for mobile home spaces as he has been looking for <br /> a space for 4 months while his wife resides here with her new job and he lives <br /> in'Charlotte while they seek new living arrangements. <br /> Crank Williams, co-owner of 145 acres adjacent to the site, indicated that <br /> he had discussed this matter with the two other owners and that they had ex- <br /> pressed concern about lowering of the property values, particularly given the <br /> location in vicinity of 1-40. He added that he was not opposed to mobile homes <br /> but was concerned that mobile home parks run down after some years. He added <br /> that he drove through Oakdale Mobile Home Park I and was impressed with it. He <br /> asked that the Board require all improvements be in place prior to the start-- <br /> up of the park, if approved. <br /> Charlotte Huckabee•expressed concern that there is also a need for up- <br /> graded housing and that her nephew had been searching for some time. She added <br /> that her property would be a buffer for this proposal. <br /> NOTE: HILDA BRODY WAS SWORN IN. <br /> ' Ms. Brody asked if a second phase of the park was planned. Stephens .re- <br /> sponded that there was no second Phase proposed. <br /> 'Smith clarified that the property was located in the Rural Buffer and that <br /> under that plan designation only a density of one unit per acre was permitted. <br /> Stephens indicated that he was clustering the permitted number of units on <br /> the property to provide for utilities and improvements and to retain the wooded <br /> area for recreation and open space. He added that this is a breakeven project <br /> given that his son, who'helps maintain the existing property, is now older and <br /> 011 be given a salary. <br /> Shanklin asked if .those who stated that the use would not enhance the <br /> value of their property had any evidence' supporting their comments, i.e. <br /> examples of where such uses affected property adversely. Shanklin added that <br /> this evidence should be submitted at this time. <br /> Huckabee expressed concern that she felt the property would be difficult. <br /> to sell as a result. Williams indicated that his comments were based only on. <br /> the feelings of the other owners. <br /> •Stephens noted that three mobile homes currently adjoin the property and <br /> Mr. Williams property and that these were in bad shape. He submitted pictures <br /> of the adjoining mobile homes and pictures of Oakdale Park I as evidence. <br /> Stephens indicated he was willing to comply with the staff recommended <br /> conditions. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Chair Willhoit that <br /> the ' public hearing be Continued to January 7, 1984 to receive the Planning <br /> Board's recommendation. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> • <br /> 8. ZONING ORDSNANCT TEXT An6NENT-SXrS•DJ, UgR_,pBRfr'f t,QR mine HS Oi <br /> HISTORIC STRUCTURES <br /> r The staff presentation•was made by Satan Smith. There was no comment on <br /> the item. " <br /> • <br /> 9. ?QflTMG ORDINANCE, TUT AMENPMENT_B0'0R VEAICJ+p,, RAr,ps/P.rNTAr,S IJ3 Cep <br /> ZONING DISTRICT <br /> • <br /> • The staff presentation was made by Susan Smith. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 11161- _ <br />