Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
' MOTION: • Laszlo moved that the Board recommend positive findings on 8.2.4 ' <br /> • <br /> and 4.2. Walters seconded the motion. . <br /> Pilkey requested that Staff present a summary map of the-area. <br /> . Gordon directed that where phases of development occour on-a . <br /> single property that a map indicating: these project phases be <br /> available •in the future. • <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor. -' <br /> Yuhasz abstained. . <br /> • . MOTION: Shanklin moved that the Board recommend positive findings on 7.4 ' <br /> (20.3.2 through 7.4.3) . Laszlo seconded the motion. . <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor <br /> • Shanklin opposed. <br /> Yuhasz. abstained. • <br /> . MOTION: Laszlo moved that the Board recommend positive findings on 7,171d- <br /> ' 7.15.10 • <br /> • Walters seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE:. 6 in favor. • <br /> • Yuhasz abstained. <br /> • M0TiON: Laszlo moved that the. Board recommend positive findings on a)3-b) , <br /> • . except (d) . Shanklin seconded the.motion. . . . <br /> Shanklin felt (d) was not applicable. • . <br /> ' Greenberg questioned the lack of submittal of a landscaping plan. i <br /> • • Smith commented that without assurance of 'approval, great expenditure <br /> • ' is involved on a landscape plan and that .one could' be submitted <br /> . later for review and approval according' to ordinance requirements. <br /> Smith responded to Shanklin that (d) was applicable, but that the <br /> • . applicant had requested that these requirements be waived. , . <br /> • <br />