Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• . . <br /> The Board reviewed the recommended conditions. <br /> MOTION: Shanklin mbved that the three general findings have been satisfied <br /> and that the Board recommends that the project is approved with the . <br /> 19 conditions, Laszlo seconded the motion. <br /> . • <br /> Greenberg questioned the evidence regarding the general finding <br /> #2. Gordon cited the adjacent property owners. opinion stated at <br /> the public hearing. Shanklin noted he had questioned the woman <br /> . . , <br /> about the evidence on which she was basing her comments. • <br /> Greenberg questioned condition #8. Smith explained that the condition <br /> puts all parties on notice and defined an erosion control device. <br /> Pilkey inquired about road standards, state take-over and school <br /> • • <br /> bus service. She expressed concern about road maintenance. Smith <br /> noted condition #4 addresses maintenance. . Walters suggested school <br /> bus shelters might be desirable on these cases. . <br /> • <br /> • Greenberg inquired about total lot standards and equipment safety, <br /> Smith responded that the County Ordinance did not provide standards— . <br /> • <br /> VOTE : 6 in favor. <br /> : • . . • Greenberg oeppsed. ' • <br /> • - • • <br /> • <br /> on 6CCONEECNEE POINT II <br /> Yuhasz indicated his abstaintion from voting due to conflict <br /> • <br /> • <br /> with interest. • <br /> MOTION: Watlers moved that the Board make positive findings on 8.6-8.8. <br /> Leslo seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. • • <br /> Greenberg asked Smith to describe FIA maps. • <br /> . • • • <br /> . . • <br /> • • <br />