Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
0 6 0 oRafr �E4 but 014 1�r� <br /> 2 <br /> There are also no public waste disposal facilities available. He also <br /> expressed concern with the type of commercial . activities that would be <br /> allowed and the traffic impact on Old PI.C. 86. He asked for those opposed to <br /> the study to stand and ten (10) stood in opposition while two (2). stood in <br /> favor of the proposal. <br /> Mr. Leland Phelps expressed concern with water supply capacity <br /> if industry comes in with a great demand for water. He had concern with <br /> "exceptions" and asked what kinds of industry or commercial uses would be <br /> located in such a small area. He noted that only a mile down the road were <br /> uses that would probably just be duplicated. <br /> Smith responded that rural industrial uses proposed were <br /> "limited" and could not generate impacts beyond the building itself. The <br /> Commercial Transition activity node classification would allow any commercial <br /> use. <br /> • <br /> Mrs. Gertrude Rippy expressed opposition to any commercial or <br /> • industrial use in this area. She felt that the noise from 1-40 would be <br /> enough disturbance as her home is less that 600 feet from 1-40. (Smith <br /> identified Mrs. Rippy's property on the map). <br /> Jim Hawks spoke in favor of the study. His property will be <br /> split due to the relocation of New 86 and he felt it was a total loss to him <br /> for the use for which he currently utilizes his property. He would prefer to - <br /> have his entire property zoned commercial. Smith identified the Hawk <br /> property on the map. <br /> Mike Dodson, who lives southeast of the interchange would like <br /> for his property to be in the Commercial Transition activity node. He does <br /> not wish to live so near 1-40 and would prefer to nave and have his property <br /> zoned commercial. <br /> 3. a Lia T 5E 17T.AN w Er+ir <br /> Smith made the presentation. <br /> The purpose of this agenda item is-to receive public' comment on <br /> three (3) Secondary Land Use Plan amendments as follows: <br /> LUP-4--84 Khye Weng Ng & Guat Chang rIg <br /> LL7P-5-84 Bob and Rachael Scholar <br /> LUP-6-84 James L. Freeland <br /> All three amendment requests are located north of the . Town of <br /> Hillsborough corporate limits territorial- and extra-territorial planning -• <br /> jurisdiction within Hillsborough Township. All three request a redesignation <br /> from Agricultural-Residential to Ten Year Transition. <br />