Orange County NC Website
377 <br /> Draft <br /> proposed amendment is intended to do if they extend the sewer and water down there. I recognize that the bigger <br /> picture is really to make these southern quadrants on the south of 40 generate more capacity and make sure <br /> there's a water tap. I think it's a good idea. I don't know if you have a map anywhere where the rural buffer zone is; <br /> do you have that map?... So if you come off of 40, obviously those are the parcels you're talking about, this is the <br /> Davis Road and, I think you two gentlemen were speaking back and forth, the flow of the watershed this way goes <br /> south and this way goes north. These properties right here.The conversations about the gas stations were relevant <br /> because I think it seems if there was a 10-year transition zone the use of these properties is intended not to be <br /> residential anymore. I think that was said in the beginning, that there are parts of this area that are envisioned to be <br /> non-residential.As a result what's going to happen, and what I would really encourage you guys to participate in, is <br /> you're going to be left with some orphaned properties along the bottom here. And these orphaned properties, <br /> currently, are zoned R1. And those R1 properties have water coming already and it makes sense to fill out this <br /> quadrant to encompass those types of uses. It makes sense from the watershed area to include those into the <br /> zoning amendment. If that was to be the purpose... I did a little bit of learning about this and the learning I <br /> understood is it typically when you have these type of zonings and bunt up against a rural buffer zone that they are <br /> all included in one same use that was your solution for --- otherwise you'd have a manufacturing type usage that <br /> bunts in ---residential, and it just messes up uses of property. So, I think my objective is to make sure that the uses <br /> of these properties down here, I know that we have other neighbors who are along here and I know they've been <br /> approached for their property to be purchased for a large roadway to come through here. So I know there is the <br /> development of these properties and it isn't going to be without some flow of traffic for commercial uses. I think if <br /> you do look down the road 10 years from now, I think then you guys are thinking right but this area and these <br /> quadrants are going to be commercial and so I request to you guys to include these properties here and don't <br /> orphan these off. Particularly as they naturally flow into the economic development zone that you guys are <br /> intending to create here. <br /> Lydia Wegman: So you're asking for an expansion? <br /> Nathan Robinson: I would say to extend it down here, naturally. So that as the rural buffer doesn't end, that the use <br /> of this property flows through without creating these little R1's right in the middle. <br /> Lydia Wegman: Ok, thank you. <br /> Perdita Holtz: Including the area between the EDD and Rural Buffer wouldn't be possible with this amendment <br /> because the Water and Sewer Planning, Boundary, and Management Agreement would have to be amended to <br /> designate the area as primary service area, but it's something we can keep in mind for the future. <br /> Craig Benedict: Chair,just what we can do for the audience and for the Board, all these questions are being written <br /> down and we'll have our thoughts moving forward to both the Commissioners for something such as suggested we <br /> would engage Hillsborough. It's part of their growth area.And as Perdita mentioned, the transition area that we are <br /> talking about; the transition means going from a rural to an urban transition. Where the public water and sewer go <br /> and where it cannot go. So, we'll make recommendations as we are starting to see the growth potential with the <br /> hospital, bringing sewer closer to this area. Maybe it is time to re-engage with Hillsborough again. It's been 12 plus <br /> years since we designated development to say what's happening to the south and our uses and areas. So we will <br /> be answering all the questions that are coming up tonight.... We can give some brief answers tonight but as an <br /> outcome of what we're hearing tonight if it directly affects the amendments we'll of course make some <br /> recommendations. Some may come back to you; some may be for future projects. <br /> Lydia Wegman: Well, that's what I'm wondering. In light of what we've heard, you're still asking for us to make a <br /> recommendation to the BOCC tonight even though we wont have the answers to some of these questions? <br /> Craig Benedict:Once we've gone through all of them I can give you the ones that we can answer now. <br /> Lydia Wegman: Does anyone else from the public want to speak this evening? <br /> 4 <br />