Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment 3 249 <br /> 1 Excerpt of Notes SUMMARY NOTES <br /> 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 3 Jun(6,2016 <br /> 4 ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE <br /> 5 <br /> 6 NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman-At-Large Chapel Hill Township(Chair); Tony Blake, Bingham Township <br /> 9 Representative (Vice-Chair); Paul Guthrie,At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Maxecine Mitchell,At-Large Bingham <br /> 10 Township; Kim Piracci,At-Large; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; <br /> 11 <br /> 12 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director;Tom Altieri, Current Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz, Planning <br /> 13 Systems Supervisor;Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner; Meredith Pucci Administrative Assistant; <br /> 14 <br /> 15 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Lydia Wegman called meeting to order. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 **************************** <br /> 20 <br /> 21 AGENDA ITEM 4: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH/ORANGE COUNTY CENTRAL ORANGE COORDINATED AREA LAND USE <br /> 22 PLAN AMENDMENT <br /> 23 <br /> 24 To receive information about an upcoming Land Use Plan amendment involving five parcels <br /> 25 south of Interstate 40 in the vicinity of Old Highway 86. Amendments are proposed to better <br /> 26 promote economic development opportunities in the area and help preserve planned sewer <br /> 27 capacities for non-single-family residential uses. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Presenter: Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Tom Altieri delivered presentation. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Tony Blake: Is this change being driven by the landowners or by the County or by the town? <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Craig Benedict:There will be an interlocal agreement that will probably refer to these changes that occur here that <br /> 36 says,"As long as you redevelop consistent with this joint land use plan then please feel free to use this public water <br /> 37 and sewer system."So the commissioners, probably in September,will be seeing a draft of this interlocal agreement <br /> 38 that if the County puts"x"amount of dollars into public water and sewer that they'll use it for, primarily, non-residential <br /> 39 economic development purposes.This is kind of a pre-requisite to that impending public water and sewer extension. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Lydia Wegman: So they're not disturbed at losing the mixed residential... <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Craig Benedict: No, because along the frontage of South Churton and Old 86 it's still there. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Tom Altieri: So I'll just add that the agreement that Craig mentioned, that is the last bullet in the PowerPoint here, and <br /> 46 it is an important component.The group mentioned"annexation"and the text and zoning amendments that are being <br /> 47 made to the UDO, those are within the County's UDO. In the case of an annexation, a development would occur <br /> 48 under the town's land develop ordinance. So it is that type of an agreement that would outline under what conditions <br /> 49 annexation might occur, its timing, if there were a component of, let's say, this entire Hillsborough economic <br /> 50 development district is approximately 500 acres, potentially what percentage of that might be developed for non- <br /> 51 residential uses versus residential? An agreement could address. So that's where the County could receive that <br /> 52 official handshake from the town on the ratio between residential and non-residential development in the area. <br /> 53 <br /> 1 <br />