Orange County NC Website
oti27i2oo~ <br />Option 2. Commissioners approve funding for Elementary #10 at requested $24.3 million ($1 <br />million above the amount presently included in the County's current debt issuance plans <br />for Elementary #10 and Twin Creeks Infrastructure) and approve a project funding plan <br />whereby Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools uses other funding source(s) to cover the <br />project cost overruns. ~'~ t2> <br />Pros/Advantages Cons/Disadvanta es <br />• Anticipated school opening date remains • Timing constraints do not allow opportunities to <br />at August 2008 (although not a explore alternative construction options such as <br />uarantee) Construction Mana er at Risk <br />• Complies with SAPFO Level of Service • Little or no understanding of project cost prior to <br />(LOS) for Elementary rade levels awardin contract <br />• Allows for K through Grade 3 class size .Requires little fiscal discipline on behalf of school <br />reductions (from 1:23 to 1:21 students district and County <br />er class for both school districts <br />• Applies School Construction Standards <br />principles including sustainable design • Displays little political will for cost control <br />features <br />• Allows County to stay within its debt • Blame of tax rate increase goes to Commissioners <br />limitation and not Board of Education <br />• Tax burden of $1 million increase in <br />project budget shared by those residents • Limits opportunities for County to be involved with <br />within the School's Special District and project and costs <br />not to residents outside of the District <br />• To school supporters, presents <br />appearance of fully funding education if • Negates negotiations with bidders <br />project funded at CHCCS requested level <br /> • Widens the funding inequity between CHCCS and <br /> OCS <br /> • Increasing taxes seen as a burden by many - <br /> particularly the senior population who have no <br /> children in the schools stem <br /> • Presents appearance of fully funding education if <br /> project funded at CHCCS requested level <br /> • Sets an expectation for fully funding future projects; <br /> keeping in mind that SAPFO projections (with K-3 <br /> class size at 1:21) identify the need for Elementary <br /> #11 to come on-line in school ear 2010-11 <br /> • Historically, CHCCS has requested increases in the <br /> special district tax to fund opening of new schools. <br /> According to budget information presented by <br /> CHGCS staff at the Board of Education's Annual <br /> Planning Conference in mid-February 2007, new <br /> operational costs associated with opening Carrboro <br /> High totals $1.9 million (approximately 2.43 cents on <br /> the district tax rate) and programming of Elementary <br /> #10 totals $237,000 (approximately 1/3 of a penny <br /> on the district tax rate) for fiscal year 2007-08. c2> <br />(1) Examples of options that Commissioners might consider in funding the project overruns include <br />one-time increase in special district tax, use of the district's pay-as-you-go capital funding <br />stream and/or use of the district's fund balance or some combination of these revenues. <br />(2) One-cent on the CHCCS special district tax anticipated to generate $793,000 for fiscal year <br />2007-08. Current year CHCCS special district tax rate equals 18.85 cents per $100 valuation. <br />