Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-23-2007-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 01-23-2007
>
Agenda - 01-23-2007-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 9:06:40 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:14:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/23/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070123
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br />Robert Davis: Three of the lots have already been sold. <br />Jennifer Leaf: Even if the lot size was changed, they still wouldn't be deep enough for an <br />accessory structure. <br />Robert Davis: The 100', buffer requirement is variable by the Boards. It was put in the <br />regulations to address developments in open fields where there is no visual separation. In this <br />case, the buffer is wooded. <br />Bernadette Pelissier: If this wasn't a staff error, a 1,000 square foot house isn't very large so it <br />should have been addressed with the original application. How can this-be prevented in the <br />future? Is there any way to ensure that in the future the lots are buildable? <br />Robert Davis: Staff will have to look more closely at this type of situation in the future. <br />Bernadette Pelissier: Can this be changed in the ordinance? <br />Robert Davis: Yes, it could be. <br />Craig Benedict: A 100' buffer is easily accommodated in rural areas on 1 -2 acre lots, but not on <br />1/3 acre lots, which are the majority of the applications received. We probably need an <br />ordinance amendment to accommodate this. This is something that could be reviewed by the <br />Ordinance Review Committee. <br />Robert Davis: There was a public dedication of land along McGowan Creek that was important <br />in the original plan consideration. <br />Jay Bryan: Is there only one adjacent property that's affected by this change? <br />Robert Davis: Yes, it is one individual residence. <br />Jennifer Leaf: We didn't see an actual house on the aerial. <br />Jay Bryan: Was there any public comment on this at the time of plan approval? <br />Robert Davis: Not that I'm aware of. I can check the past minutes. <br />Jay Bryan: We want to correct these circumstances, and not allow it to set a precedent for a <br />future situation. <br />Jeff Schmitt: How large is the building envelope square footage? <br />Michelle Kempinski: 2,700 square feet. <br />Jeff Schmitt: That seems like it should be large enough. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.