Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-21-2016 - 5-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 06-21-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-21-2016 - 5-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2016 10:11:19 AM
Creation date
6/17/2016 10:10:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/21/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-21-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br /> 1 o TARPO receives 1,400 Local Input Points <br /> 2 • Points typically allocated in order of NCDOT Raw Score—this maximizes likelihood of <br /> 3 funding <br /> 4 • Depending on MPO/RPO, points allocated differently <br /> 5 • Coordination with Divisions is crucial <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Total of 23 Projects Carried Forward <br /> 8 DCHC MPO PROJECTS <br /> 9 * 17 projects submitted to SPOT P4.0 <br /> 10 * 7 projects not carried forward in SPOT P4.0 <br /> 11 * 15 total projects carried forward in SPOT P4.0 <br /> 12 TARPO PROJECTS <br /> 13 * 9 projects submitted to SPOT P4.0 <br /> 14 * 3 projects not carried forward in SPOT P4.0 <br /> 15 * 5 total projects carried forward in SPOT P4.0 <br /> 16 B-G MPO PROJECTS <br /> 17 * 3 projects submitted to SPOT P4.0 <br /> 18 * 0 projects not carried forward in SPOT P4.0 <br /> 19 * 3 total projects carried forward in SPOT P4.0 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Orange County Projects (map) <br /> 22 <br /> 23 P3.0 <br /> 24 County recommended a total of 22 projects <br /> 25 • DCHC MPO — 12 projects <br /> 26 • TARPO —4 projects <br /> 27 • B-G MPO — 6 projects <br /> 28 What was funded? <br /> 29 • State Transportation Improvement Program (Years 1-5) <br /> 30 o Hillsborough Train Station <br /> 31 • Developmental Program (Years 6-10) <br /> 32 o 1-85 to Durham County Line (originally submitted by Division 7) <br /> 33 o South Churton Street Improvements — 1-40 to Eno River <br /> 34 o Orange Grove Road Extension <br /> 35 o Buckhorn Road Widening from US 70 to West Ten Road <br /> 36 Only one County project actually funded <br /> 37 <br /> 38 P4.0 <br /> 39 County initially recommends a total of 29 projects <br /> 40 One project funded! Or is it? <br /> 41 • 1-85 and South Churton Street Intersection Improvements <br /> 42 o May be in STIP or in Developmental Program <br /> 43 Six (6) more projects receive Regional Impacts level local input points <br /> 44 More projects will received Divisions Needs level local input points <br /> 45 Maybe 1 or 2 projects will make it to STIP and 3-5 into Developmental Program <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Key Takeaways <br /> 48 Process designed to reduce list of many to list of few <br /> 49 Coordination with the NCDOT Division is crucial <br /> 50 • Both local MPOs/RPOs and Divisions must support project for it to receive funding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.