Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Barry Jacobs concluded the symposium by thanking everyone for participating. <br /> He pointed out that the task force represented a broad-based coalition, bringing together the <br /> schools, the towns, the county, the private soccer organizations, and the public at large. He <br /> noted that a solution to the identified need for additional facilities would require the continued <br /> support of all these entities. He also encouraged participants to make their desires for <br /> additional soccer facilities known to their elected officials. <br /> Recommendations <br /> At a meeting held after the Soccer Symposium, task force members concluded that additional <br /> work was needed in three areas, and formed subcommittees to develop draft recommendations <br /> for the entire group to consider. The three identified areas were: <br /> Access Issues —Specifically this subcommittee was charged with identifying ways to <br /> make programming available across various racial, ethnic, gender, and age groups. Rick <br /> Kennedy chaired this committee; its report is shown in Attachment A. <br /> Models/Economic Development—This subcommittee was to look at models of <br /> public/private partnerships in various locations across the state and region and to estimate the <br /> potential economic impact of soccer in Orange County under select scenarios. Dianne Reid <br /> chaired the committee; its report is shown in Attachment B. <br /> Inter-league Cooperation —This subcommittee focused on ways to ensure cooperation <br /> among the soccer leagues, including ways to share practice fields and any complex for soccer <br /> matches that might be developed. The group also examined public/private partnership models <br /> in relation to cooperative arrangements. Patrick Sullivan chaired this committee; its report is <br /> shown in Attachment C. <br /> Based upon the work of the subcommittees and the task force as a whole, the group has <br /> reached consensus on the following findings of fact: <br /> • Facilities do not currently meet the demand for soccer fields. <br /> • Due to the limited number of fields, fields are overused, resulting in poor (and potentially <br /> dangerous) field conditions. <br /> • Latino teams have great difficulty securing fields due to the lack of language fluency, <br /> limitations of available transportation, and a lack of knowledge about procedures for <br /> securing fields. <br /> • Relative to many other sports, soccer has low equipment costs and is thus relatively <br /> inexpensive to play. (As one citizen said at the symposium, "You only need a ball and some <br /> level ground.") <br /> • Soccer deserves promotion because it is a "clean industry" that has positive net economic <br /> benefits, while promoting teamwork and a healthy life-style. <br /> • Positive economic development impacts (in terms of tourism expenditures) result from <br /> hosting tournament play. <br /> Task force members also conducted research on the average cost of construction for fields, <br /> excluding design cost and the cost of land. Based upon data supplied by the Capital Area <br /> Soccer League (CASL) for the development costs of two fields in Raleigh and twelve proposed <br /> fields in the southern part of Wake County, basic field development (clearing, grading, <br /> sedimentation and erosion control, seeding, provision of gravel roads and parking, basic <br />