Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-02-2016 - Abstract for Joint Meeting Discussion Items
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 06-02-2016 - Joint Mtg. - Chapel Hill Town Council
>
Agenda - 06-02-2016 - Abstract for Joint Meeting Discussion Items
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2016 11:57:27 AM
Creation date
5/27/2016 11:11:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/2/2016
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-02-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FY17 Orange Funding Application Feedback(Third Sector Alliance Survey) 38 <br /> 14 We had to do a separate Excel because the embedding did not work. 2/16/2016 2:27 PM <br /> 15 The embedded Excel budget sheets were difficult to work with and much time was spent on getting formatting and 2/16/2016 2:22 PM <br /> insertion to work correctly.I did not receive timely email feedback about receipt of electronically submitted application <br /> materials causing concern and several additional follow-up efforts to ensure we had met the submission deadline. <br /> 16 I submitted the attachments via a Zip file,but Orange County staff couldn't access it.Nor could they when I tried 2/16/2016 12:56 PM <br /> sharing the files from Google Drive.I had to email the attachments one-by-one. <br /> 17 The Work Statement table once input back into the Word Document was too small to be legible.I just printed straight 2/16/2016 12:39 PM <br /> from Excel and incorporated into the packet additional pages. <br /> 18 We had some issues w/the timestamp feature of the document and trying to get signatures. 2/16/2016 12:32 PM <br /> 19 Could not work easily with Excel pages 2/16/2016 12:29 PM <br /> 20 I say yes,but it really was about the messy,jumbled,and unnecessarily complicated-ness of the form.I hope that it 2/16/2016 12:20 PM <br /> works really well for the recipient funding boards.If it does,I am happy to do it.If not,I would say that it needs to be <br /> revised.In my opinion,combining the forms with local government human services and federal requests was a terrible <br /> idea.My understanding is that these funders have different needs and different relationships with the grantee <br /> agencies. <br /> 21 Regardless of what was done,even by a very experienced and adept computer employee,it was impossible to get the 2/16/2016 12:19 PM <br /> worksheets working correctly.Either they disappeared off the page,or if usable,the table did not allow you to enter all <br /> the data in a viable format!It became much easier to simply do a spreadsheet and insert it.Since we apply to other <br /> local government entities for funding,we have learned to use and work with the different formats.This one was by far <br /> the most difficult and we are not sure why it needs to be when other counties and towns are using a similar application <br /> and there are no problems getting the information onto the application at all. <br /> 22 Mostly in the charts and budget sections. 2/16/2016 12:18 PM <br /> 14 / 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.