Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-17-2016 - 5-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 05-17-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-17-2016 - 5-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2016 2:54:57 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 2:54:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/17/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-17-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 1 Commissioner Jacobs said he asked Margaret Samuels to attend the meeting since she <br /> 2 had worked in pre-K for years. <br /> 3 Commissioner Jacobs said he read through all the materials and the rationale for <br /> 4 changing the pre-K model. He asked if it is known which portion of the program would be <br /> 5 funded locally. He remembered the conversation from years ago making the case that it is <br /> 6 easier to transfer a pre-K student into an existing elementary school. He asked if the proposed <br /> 7 LC project is better for the teaching staff or for the students. <br /> 8 Margaret Samuels said pre-K is funded in many different ways. She said CHCCS runs <br /> 9 the Head Start grant locally, but OCS runs its program slightly differently. She said as far what <br /> 10 provides a good pre-k experience for a child is a consistent, licensed and trained teacher first <br /> 11 and foremost. She said it would be optimal if there were enough money to put every child in a <br /> 12 pre-K class at their assigned neighborhood school, but this is currently happening with less than <br /> 13 50% of the pre-K students. <br /> 14 Margaret Samuels said the opportunities that the consolidation offers is that there would <br /> 15 be health services at the Lincoln Center, ratio of teacher to children, programmatic benefits, <br /> 16 and the most important piece is the availability for all of the pre-K teachers to collaborate, meet, <br /> 17 train together, etc. at one site. She said this project is the best compromise at this time. <br /> 18 Chair McKee referred to the next phase projects and said there is an expectation of <br /> 19 future bonds. He read a portion of the abstract pertaining to Orange County's funds planned <br /> 20 for future new schools. He asked if there could be clarification regarding this. <br /> 21 Todd LoFrese said Phase 1 projects are bond projects. He said CHCCS has requested <br /> 22 that for Phase 2 projects, the District be given access to what was in the CIP last year. He said <br /> 23 the 10-year CIP included funding for elementary school number 12 and a high school addition <br /> 24 at Carrboro High School. He said if these funds could be accessed to complete Phase 2 <br /> 25 projects, then a new elementary school and a high school addition will not be necessary for <br /> 26 quite some time. He said Phase 1 projects will significantly address capacity issues as well. <br /> 27 Chair McKee asked if SAPFO numbers push out those two projects past the 10-year <br /> 28 mark, what justification would there be to release those funds in year two or three. <br /> 29 James Barrett said these funds were never intended for years two or three. <br /> 30 Chair McKee said if these projects are to be completed over 10 years, then funds would <br /> 31 need to be released in the third year. <br /> 32 Todd LoFrese said a small amount of Phase 2 projects begin in FY 2018-19, but the <br /> 33 majority of these projects are in FY 2020-21. <br /> 34 James Barrett said it is harder for act any sooner, because once the pre-K students are <br /> 35 co-located at the LC, there needs to be some flexibility at the schools in order to move students <br /> 36 around during construction. <br /> 37 Todd LoFrese said every year that passes gets the District a year closer to when a new <br /> 38 school may be needed. He said there is a lull right now, and great strides can be made. <br /> 39 Chair McKee said he is trying to understand the mechanics of these projects. He said <br /> 40 there will be 189 additional seats provided by the LC project, and asked if that will not satisfy <br /> 41 the capacity issues that Phase 2 seeks to address. <br /> 42 Todd LoFrese said it delays the capacity need but not the condition of the schools. <br /> 43 James Barrett said it is a buffer to complete the construction. <br /> 44 Chair McKee referred to Phase 3, and asked if there could be clarification regarding the <br /> 45 statement "future funding resources will be identified" in the abstract. <br /> 46 Todd LoFrese said the CHCCS tried to align the Phase 2 projects with the funding that <br /> 47 was planned for last year in the 10-year CIP. He said it is unknown where Phase 3 funds would <br /> 48 come from. <br /> 49 James Barrett said if the funds allotted to the CIP can be repurposed for Phase 2 <br /> 50 projects, a great deal of progress can be made to make CHCCS safer and stronger. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.