Orange County NC Website
22 <br /> 1 Commissioner Jacobs said he does not remember if the Board discussed this building, <br /> 2 the BOCC vision for it, and the costs. <br /> 3 Jeff Thompson said this was part of the Space Study Work Group, and the thrust of the <br /> 4 conversation is to make the existing services in that facility more efficient from a space <br /> 5 standpoint and bringing the building up to current standards. <br /> 6 Commissioner Jacobs said he was uncomfortable moving forward without further <br /> 7 discussion. <br /> 8 Bonnie Hammersley said this is going to be a long process, because one part of the <br /> 9 process is stakeholder involvement in the design portion. She said the Board will be involved in <br /> 10 that process. <br /> 11 Commissioner Jacobs said a huge mistake was made following this exact procedure <br /> 12 with the Southwest Branch Library. He said he would like the Board to have input first before <br /> 13 receiving input from other stakeholders. <br /> 14 Commissioner Dorosin said he thought the Board had a conversation about different <br /> 15 options, and concluded that all services should all remain co-located, with the building either <br /> 16 being rehabbed or making a new building on the same parcel of land. He suggested reviewing <br /> 17 the minutes for prior conversations. <br /> 18 Chair McKee said the item has been discussed several times and he does support <br /> 19 keeping the services in the same location. He said he does not support this capital project as <br /> 20 he feels the building has life left in it, with some minor renovations. He said there are many <br /> 21 other major projects that will need millions of dollars such as the schools and affordable <br /> 22 housing. He said the building may not be ideal, but it is not falling down and is not a valid <br /> 23 expenditure of$3 million. He said he also does not support $300,000 to pursue a plan as he <br /> 24 feels it is committing to an unnecessary project. <br /> 25 Commissioner Burroughs asked if the rationale for moving the project forward could be <br /> 26 explained by someone who served on the space committee. <br /> 27 Chair McKee said he served on that committee but did not speak out at that time as the <br /> 28 committee was not making decisions. He said Commissioner Price also served on the Space <br /> 29 Study committee. <br /> 30 Commissioner Price said the argument was made that the building is old and would <br /> 31 need renovations at some point, whether sooner or later. She said her greater concern was <br /> 32 that the services remain co-located. She said if a new building were proposed, she would <br /> 33 support having it on the same parcel of land. <br /> 34 Jeff Thompson said context is important, and a submission was made for a new HVAC <br /> 35 system and roof a few years ago. He said at that time, the submission was denied, and a new <br /> 36 location favored. He said he believes the current location is excellent, and he would support <br /> 37 maintaining it with either a new building or renovation of the current one. <br /> 38 Commissioner Burroughs said the two options are to spend $1 million now and get a few <br /> 39 more years of life or spend $3 million in the coming year and get a lot more years. <br /> 40 Jeff Thompson said the larger investment would offer greater energy efficiency as well <br /> 41 as greater space efficiency. <br /> 42 Commissioner Burroughs said she appreciates Chair McKee's points but would support <br /> 43 the larger investment. <br /> 44 Commissioner Jacobs agreed with Commissioner Burroughs and said this is going to be <br /> 45 an extensive cost benefit analysis which seems sensible. He said he must have missed a <br /> 46 portion of the discussions on this topic. <br /> 47 Commissioner Rich agreed with Commissioners Burroughs and Jacobs. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded Commissioner Pelissier by for <br /> 50 the Board to: <br />