Orange County NC Website
The North Carolina League of Municipalities <br />Page 14 of 16 <br />intention to phase out the annual $172 million transfer to the General Fund from the Highway Trust Fund. <br />The Highway Trust Fund construction budget (loops and infra-state system) was lower than the previous <br />years due to decreased revenue estimates for the Highway Trust Fund. <br />There is considerable "buzz" about the potential for a Special Session of the General Assembly for <br />transportation issues. Whether a special session is called (either by the Governor or the required 2/3 <br />majority of legislators), or a "special commission" is appointed, there is near universal agreement that <br />transportation needs were not adequately addressed in this last session. The challenge now will be to <br />ensure municipal transportation needs are well-defined and a central part of whatever public dialogue or <br />deliberations do take place. <br />Private Roads HB 976 - Przblic Vel:icrrlar Areas Defzrzed adds gated community roads to the <br />definition of public vehicular areas for purposes of North Carolina law and clarifies that emergency <br />service vehicles are to be granted immediate access to such roads. <br />Street Construction/Maintenance Responsibility-A major departure from the past appears in SB 1513 <br />- County Ti•mzsportatiou Financing and Mru:icipal Powell Bill, which allows counties to participate in <br />financing, acquire land, use eminent domain and make improvements to the state highway system (not <br />municipal systems). Heretofore, counties did not have general authority to participate in transportation <br />programs in North Carolina. The legislation also allows municipalities, if they choose to do so, to <br />reprogram municipal Powell Bill funds to complete State TIP projects. HB 1576 - Coordinated Traffic <br />Signals/Reduce Energy Use permits municipalities or MPOs to develop traffic control plans that <br />coordinate traffic lights on state roads that become part of a municipal street system. This bill passed the <br />House and is eligible in the short session. SB 373 -Street Cor:strrzetiorr/Developer Responsibility passed <br />the Senate as a local bill that applies only to Onslow County and the municipalities therein, but it is likely <br />to be made statewide if it advances in the short session. As written the bill would limit the ability of <br />municipalities to plan for and seek appropriate developer participation in the costs of transportation <br />improvements associated with new developments. ADOT-backed bill to require municipalities to take <br />responsibility for more streets from the state, HB 1462 - Mrrrzicipal Street Provisior:s, did not come up in <br />committee this session and did not advance. <br />Study-HB 1005 -Various Ti•mzsportation Changes/Study, passed on the last day of the session, added <br />transportation to the responsibilities of the state's Debt Affordability Advisory Committee and required <br />DOT to present a study to the Joint Legislative Transportation Committee by October 1, 2007 that <br />recommends any legislation for improving transportation, including alternative funding. It also authorized <br />the State Budget Office to spend $1 million to prepare a "statewide logistics plan" for commerce, <br />transportation, and long teen economic growth and to report its findings to the Joint Legislative <br />Transportation Committee by April 1, 2008. <br />Utilities <br />Electric Service Territories-Territorial disputes between electric cities and electric membership <br />corporations will be resolved by the NC Utilities Commission under HB 1395 -Electric <br />Srzppliers/Electricities Assig~zzz:ezzt (SL 2007-419). To the extent that the parties have been unable to <br />reach agreement by May 31, 2007, the Commission has jurisdiction to resolve all issues related to the <br />negotiations and either party may petition for the exercise of that jurisdiction. The Commission is to <br />consider public convenience and necessity in reaching its decision but may not consider rate differentials <br />between the city and the electric membership corporation. Electricities successfully fended off various <br />unfavorable provisions and the League supported their position. <br />Liability-Legislation that passed the Senate would help to clarify a water utility's liability for water <br />characteristics that do not violate drinking water standards. SB I259 - No Liability/Water Meets Water <br />Stazzdards specifies that the water provider is not deemed to be an insurer of the quality of the water so <br />long as the water meets or exceeds the standards in the state drining water statutes. The provider of the <br />water is not deemed to be giving a warranty under the Uniform Commercial Code. The bill remains <br />eligible for further consideration in 2008. <br />Renewable Energy-Legislation created a renewable energy and energy efficiency portfolio standard for <br />electric power suppliers, including municipalities. SB 3 - Pro»:ote Renewable ErzergyBaseload <br />Cer:eratiorr (SL 2007-397) requires electric cities and electric membership corporations by 2012 to supply <br />at least 3% of their 2011 retail electric power sales through new renewable energy facilities or through <br />savings by implementation of energy efficiency measures. The percentage increases to 6% of 2014 sales <br />by 2015 and to 10% of 2017 sales for the year 2018 and thereafter. The electric public utilities must meet <br />a similar schedule but they have an additional requirement to supply at least 12.5% of 2020 sales by the <br />year 2021 and thereafter. The bill also includes provisions that allow public utilities to recover costs for <br />new nuclear facilities until they are producing energy. <br />http://www.nchn.org/LegalBulletin/2007/08-24-07.htm 8/28/2007 <br />