Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-27-2007-d3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 08-27-2007
>
Agenda - 08-27-2007-d3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 9:39:08 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:05:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
d3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070827
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br />Orange County TDR Implementation Planning <br />8. Apply Additional <br />a. Building Design Guidelines <br />�6 !"ffi`6'f:"1mpQc1 <br />Decreases the value of <br />Development Restrictions <br />or Requirements in <br />credits to developers, may <br />Receiving Areas <br />deVeiopfb-' <br />deter developers from <br />Should Orange County apply <br />using credits <br />additional site development <br />guidelines such as design <br />`zv <br />guidelines or affordable <br />housing requirements, instead <br />dic <br />of adhering to current <br />development guidelines and <br />policies for TDR projects? <br />b. Affordable Housing Requirements <br />13 Encourages more <br />IM -, f i", <br />1.7 <br />affordable housing <br />.401WIncuf"opposi <br />istlh- <br />options for medium- <br />16' 01,f�J <br />and low-wage families <br />t1h, <br />9. Allow Commercial <br />1 <br />Existing codes' volume <br />Development Credits <br />fehIT' 1, <br />restrictions difficult to <br />calculate and translate <br />Should Orange County relax <br />er e, <br />into a density bonus <br />restrictions on parking, open <br />Existing codes provide <br />space, building height, <br />little restriction on <br />setbacks, or other <br />dg�' <br />commercial development <br />requirements to encourage <br />,5WJ <br />t b <br />intensify vs. current market <br />commercial development in <br />anju <br />demand <br />Receiving Areas instead of <br />rp,, y in <br />Open space requirement <br />only allowing residential-to- <br />I <br />is most obvious one to be <br />residential TDR transactions? <br />exchanged for sending <br />area credits, but there's no <br />gain to the County for <br />trading open space <br />neededtokeep <br />commer cial development <br />livable in urbanizing areas <br />for open space needed to <br />keep rural areas from <br />being eveloped <br />0 = Recommended Course of Action <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.