Orange County NC Website
4 <br /> 1 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Orange County Board of Commissioners does <br /> 2 hereby support the Non-Discrimination Policy implemented by the <br /> 3 Charlotte City Council and joins them in striving for social justice for all. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 This the 22nd day of March 2016. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Commissioner Price asked if this resolution simply states that the BOCC is in support of <br /> 8 Charlotte. <br /> 9 Commissioner Jacobs said yes. <br /> 10 Commissioner Rich said she understood that if Charlotte proceeds with litigation, <br /> 11 Orange County would join them. <br /> 12 Commissioner Dorosin said that is a separate petition and depending on what happens, <br /> 13 such a petition may be brought forward. <br /> 14 Commissioner Dorosin referred to Commissioner Price's point, saying he had previously <br /> 15 asked about adding transgender discrimination to the Orange County ordinance, and that <br /> 16 County Attorney John Roberts had said such an addition was unnecessary as the ordinance <br /> 17 already covered such discrimination. <br /> 18 Commissioner Dorosin asked if he is remembering this correctly. <br /> 19 John Roberts said for a number of years Orange County's enforcement officers have <br /> 20 treated transgender issues as part of the sexual orientation language in the Orange County <br /> 21 ordinance. He said the current ordinance offers protection to Orange County citizens in this <br /> 22 matter without adding additional language. <br /> 23 Commissioner Dorosin suggested that the Board consider some type of public <br /> 24 statement that the Orange County ordinance, as written, does protect transgendered people <br /> 25 and all that may face discrimination because of sexual orientation. <br /> 26 Commissioner Jacobs asked if there is a group that the County has tried to add as <br /> 27 protected but failed to do so as the State would strike it down. <br /> 28 John Roberts said that language has been modified by the legislature and it will be seen <br /> 29 in their legislative agenda packet in April. He said the General Assembly is being asked to pass <br /> 30 legislation that will protect all. <br /> 31 Greg Wilder, County Manager's Office, said the current language, that is included in the <br /> 32 legislatives issues work group, relates to gender identity and sexual orientation. He said the <br /> 33 language is based on the prior attorney's interpretation and John Roberts said now that this <br /> 34 covers it all. <br /> 35 John Roberts said he takes a broader view of the definition of sex and gender and <br /> 36 allows enforcement officers to protect all the citizens of Orange County. <br /> 37 Chair McKee said if this resolution was to oppose the legislature interfering in local <br /> 38 affairs, then he could support it. He said this resolution seems to indicate an alignment with, or <br /> 39 a following suit of, Charlotte. He said Charlotte is not unified on its ordinance and this <br /> 40 ordinance does much more than just dictate who can use which bathroom. He said it <br /> 41 specifically takes out "showers, bath houses, YMCAs and YWCAs" and could mean camps, <br /> 42 dormitory-lodging facilities. He said he has some issues with Charlotte's ordinance. <br /> 43 Chair McKee referred to Section 12-58 of the Charlotte ordinance, which included <br /> 44 prohibited acts. He said this section violates this first amendment. He said the resolution is <br /> 45 well written and he thanked Commissioners Jacobs and Dorosin for their work. He said the <br /> 46 resolution states Orange County values but due to the resolution header stating support of the <br /> 47 Charlotte ordinance, he will not be able to support the resolution. <br /> 48 Commissioner Dorosin said he appreciated Chair McKee's opposition but said the <br /> 49 ordinance is referring to signs that say gays are not allowed, for example, and he wished that <br /> 50 the Board could pass an ordinance like Charlotte. He respectfully disagreed with Chair McKee. <br />