Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-19-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 04-19-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-19-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2016 8:05:11 AM
Creation date
4/15/2016 8:04:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/19/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> 1 Commissioner Jacobs said there are certain criteria that cut across both sets of <br /> 2 recommendations that may or may not produce the same priority list. He added that since the <br /> 3 Board would be approving $120 million, such an analysis would allow the Board more comfort <br /> 4 with what was being recommended, and that it met the criteria that the Board deems important: <br /> 5 physical safety of the students, the health and safety in the buildings, the capacity of the <br /> 6 buildings, and the technological and other deficiencies in the buildings. <br /> 7 Commissioner Jacobs said these variables could be compared on a grid and see which <br /> 8 items came out the highest. He said if this analysis is not done then the Board of County <br /> 9 Commissioners has not vetted anything. <br /> 10 Commissioner Price asked if the BOCC could do the vetting or does Commissioner <br /> 11 Jacobs feel a third party is necessary. <br /> 12 Commissioner Jacobs said he thought it would be helpful to have someone guide the <br /> 13 Board through this process and he wanted to take a fresh look. He said it never hurts to <br /> 14 challenge one's assumptions. <br /> 15 Commissioner Price said no problems have been found with what the schools have <br /> 16 presented. <br /> 17 Commissioner Rich asked if there is an established vetting process. <br /> 18 Chair McKee said currently there is none except to follow what the schools have <br /> 19 submitted. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> 22 CHCCS Board Chair James Barrett said as the Board considers this item he wanted to <br /> 23 make sure it has a clear view of what has already been done, and what is currently being <br /> 24 worked on. He reviewed a handout that was provided to the Board which gave an overview and <br /> 25 justification of the priorities. He said he is always willing to speak to any of the commissioners. <br /> 26 James Barrett referred to the centralized Pre-K program at the Lincoln Center, noting it <br /> 27 will add capacity at the existing schools. He said it is the cornerstone of addressing capacity <br /> 28 issues, as renovation is not possible at the elementary schools. He said this project would <br /> 29 provide several other enhancements to the district and the community at large. He said adding <br /> 30 a consultant does not enhance this process. He expressed appreciation for the BOCC's <br /> 31 commitment to the schools via the bond, and asked that a consultant not muddy the process. <br /> 32 OCS Board Chair Donna Coffey said she is here to speak on behalf of their board. She <br /> 33 said three years ago, OCS spent over $253,000 of pay-as-you-go capital money in <br /> 34 comprehensive, all-inclusive, safety and condition studies for all facilities. She said CHCCS <br /> 35 embarked on similar studies. She said the results showed excessive facility needs, at the cost <br /> 36 of $160 million. She said their board has spent countless hours reviewing their consultant's <br /> 37 information, knowing bond funds would not be able to address all needs. She said the priorities <br /> 38 identified are: safety; replacement of failing mechanical equipment; additional seats to <br /> 39 accommodate the growing high school population; updating food service facilities and <br /> 40 equipment; and replacement of the 50-year old transportation facilities. <br /> 41 Donna Coffey also discouraged the use of a third party consultant. She said both <br /> 42 school boards have done due diligence in putting forth credible, priority projects that fall within <br /> 43 the limits given. <br /> 44 Chair McKee said the comments from the Board chairs are greatly appreciated. <br /> 45 Commissioner Dorosin referred to the CHCCS hand out, noting the first item is <br /> 46 Glenwood Elementary. He asked if this project is being funded already from the CHCCS fund <br /> 47 balance. <br /> 48 Todd LoFrese said yes. <br /> 49 Commissioner Dorosin said the handout states that this project is listed as not meeting <br /> 50 "OC standards" upon completion. He asked if there could be further clarification on this point. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.