Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-18-2016 - 2016 Orange County Legislative Breakfast Cover Letter
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 04-18-2016 - Legislative Breakfast
>
Agenda - 04-18-2016 - 2016 Orange County Legislative Breakfast Cover Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2016 9:58:54 AM
Creation date
4/13/2016 3:44:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/18/2016
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-18-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 24) Eminent Domain - Oppose adding language to a <br /> constitutional amendment on eminent domain that extends <br /> any further preemption of county authority to regulate <br /> the placement of telecommunication towers; <br /> 25) Fees-In-Lieu - NCDOT as Additional Recipient - Support <br /> legislation amending North Carolina General Statute <br /> 153A-331 to add a provision allowing counties to <br /> transfer fees collected as part of subdivision <br /> development, and in lieu of required street <br /> construction, to be transferred to and held by the <br /> North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for <br /> the future construction of roads intended to be added <br /> to the State Maintained system; <br /> 26) Bona Fide Farm Use - Support legislation clarifying the <br /> farm use and agriculture exemption of 153A-340 that <br /> restricts local zoning authority applies only to <br /> property on which the production of crops or livestock <br /> is the primary use . Clarify that marketing and agri- <br /> tourism activities must be secondary uses of the <br /> property and do not qualify for the exemption in the <br /> absence of the production of crops or livestock. Local <br /> governments are seeing an increasing number of <br /> properties that, although they meet one or more <br /> criteria for exemption, such as having a federal farm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.