Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-12-2016 - 1 - Review Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) and Orange County Schools (OCS) Priorities for the Potential Bond Referendum Funds
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 04-12-2016 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 04-12-2016 - 1 - Review Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) and Orange County Schools (OCS) Priorities for the Potential Bond Referendum Funds
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2016 2:34:11 PM
Creation date
4/8/2016 2:26:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/12/2016
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-12-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phase 1 Projects Rationale HAPEL HILL- 7 <br /> Chapel Hill High School CCARMORO <br /> • significant disrepair and deferred maintenance <br /> • building has chronic flooding,moisture and mold issues CITY SCHOOLS <br /> • inadequate educational spaces,including severely antiquated science labs <br /> • aeentirecampusHV Csysemnres eplaet Older Facility Recommendations and the 2016-26 CIP <br /> • the entire campus HVAC system needs replacement <br /> • profound security concerns including:multiple access points,outdated security system,and hard to monitor entrances <br /> • major traffic and pedestrian conflicts that cause congestion,busing delays,and safety issues Key Elements of Older Fa c i I i t Recommendations <br /> • pery asiveADAissuesthroughoutthecampus (included in the 2016-26 CIP Recommendations) <br /> • scale of project requires significant financial investment(bond appropriate) <br /> Glenwood Elementary School • The recommendations are for a comprehensive pro- <br /> • provides a solution to continue safe operations for the next 10 years gram that focuses on the district's 10 oldest schools. <br /> • addresses safety and security concerns by providing a secure entrance `' - <br /> • addresses handicap accessibility and appropriate restrooms -+ i • Facility recommendations include: <br /> • addresses flooding,moisture,and mold issues hr ✓ correction of building code violations; <br /> • provides for repairs to existing infrastructure , ✓ improved safety by consolidating operations <br /> • Glenwood Elementary's continuance after 10 years is uncertain <br /> F'i c $ and controlling entry; <br /> PreK Center/Phoenix Academy/Lincoln Center ✓ indoor air quality deficiencies and health con- <br /> • provides a comprehensive facility to support early childhood education - cerns addressed; <br /> ✓ improved access to educational resources ✓ replacement of malfunctioning mechanical equip- <br /> ✓ improved services for students r ment; <br /> ✓ disadvantaged student supports ll� I ✓ relief of traffic congestion problems and pro- <br /> • returns existing space back to elementary schools and allows for phasing of other projects viding pedestrian access; <br /> • provides the greatest increase in capacity ✓ deconstruction of some inefficient buildings; <br /> ✓ 189 Elementary School seats <br /> ✓ 100 High School seats Wit,•, ✓ accessibility for all students and staff; <br /> • provides Phoenix Academy High students with appropriate and supportive facilities,including a biomedical lab - ✓ extending the life of the schools an additional 50 <br /> • provides desperately needed additional space for students with mental health needs and for students who need a smaller educa- years;and <br /> tional environment ✓ providing educational facilities that meet Orange <br /> • provides a community meeting space and a Black/education history museum -WS; <br /> • provides renovations and A/C to the existing gymnasium County school construction standards. <br /> • addresses moisture and mold concerns (S. „/. <br /> • addresses handicap accessibility issues Implementation of the recommendations eliminate <br /> • frees up future capital funding to address other school capital needs mobile classrooms(also in need of renovations) <br /> • provides appropriately-sized administrative space on the second floor,reducing total expenditures to a small fraction of the total - / while providing additional student capacity. <br /> anticipated CHCCS bond funding allocation , <br /> ✓ Elementary school capacity increase=555. <br /> ✓ High school capacity increase=155. <br /> Next Phase Projects <br /> Phase II,to begin in 3-4 years: Improvements at Ephesus,Estes Hills and Seawell Elementary Schools and Phillips Middle School. . "-�� • Increased student capacity would result in deferment <br /> These improvements provide the second most positive impact to capacity.These improvements will hopefully be funded by long range j, of new elementary school and high school additions <br /> funds Orange County has planned for the district's new schools. 0-- well beyond the 10-year CIP window. <br /> ii ii, S ✓ Delays nearly$57.6 million in projected capital-Phase III,to begin in 4-7 years: Improvements at Carrboro and Frank Porter Graham Elementary Schools and at Culbreth Middle \ expenditures. <br /> School.These projects are currently unfunded. It is hoped that future funding sources will be identified to complete all the projects. ? r ✓ <br /> Delays significant operational increases with <br /> ••■••■ 0._.- opening a new school. <br /> v r' <br /> Bond funds and future capital funds directed to the ill <br /> r — r 10 oldest schools will make available CIP(Paygo) <br /> V.4 revenue for needed maintenance at district's"newer" <br /> schools s <br /> schools that are 20-30 years of age. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.