Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-05-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 04-05-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-05-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2016 4:17:06 PM
Creation date
3/31/2016 4:16:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/5/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-05-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 On January 11, 2016 the County Manager met with staff, the OUTBoard Chair, and the Sheriff. <br /> 2 It was agreed that the best way to implement recommendations of the Bicycle Safety Report <br /> 3 would be through a Task Force with a defined charge and set term. It was also agreed that the <br /> 4 general focus of the Bicycle Safety Task Force should be on education and communication. <br /> 5 The Manager requested that the OUTBoard develop recommendations for the membership <br /> 6 composition, charge and initial term of a Bicycle Safety Task Force. Staff was instructed to <br /> 7 bring the OUTBoard's recommendations back to the BOCC at its March 1, 2016 meeting. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 The BOCC previously considered supporting efforts to increase safety awareness between <br /> 10 motorists and bicyclists, roadway safety improvements for bicyclists, and implementation of <br /> 11 next steps at its November 5, 2015 meeting. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 At its February 17, 2016 meeting the OUTBoard made recommendations regarding the Bicycle <br /> 14 Task Force membership, charge and term and forwarded it on to the BOCC for review. The <br /> 15 recommendations are included in the Bicycle Safety Task Force Resolution. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 The OUTBoard also recommends that, at the conclusion of the term of the Bicycle Safety Task <br /> 18 Force and completion of its report to the BOCC, that a subcommittee be formed to oversee the <br /> 19 ongoing implementation of the Task Force report. This is a matter that will be brought before <br /> 20 the BOCC for consideration at that future time. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Commissioner Jacobs referred to charge number 2 of the proposed resolution in <br /> 23 attachment 2, which states: "Develop an implementation timetable with estimated funding <br /> 24 request information within the first 5 meetings, and present it to the OUTBoard for review and <br /> 25 recommendation, and review and approval by the BOCC." He asked if it is known what funding <br /> 26 will be needed by this task force in its first five meetings. <br /> 27 Abigaile Pittman said the funding referred to was for public education, PSAs, etc. <br /> 28 Commissioner Jacobs asked if that would be part of the communications budget for the <br /> 29 Public Affairs office. <br /> 30 Bonnie Hammersley said once the group is created it would determine costs and then <br /> 31 look at options for funding. <br /> 32 Commissioner Pelissier referred to the recruitment of task force members and asked if <br /> 33 agencies would appoint someone as a representative. She asked if Orange County residents <br /> 34 would be recruited by advertisement. <br /> 35 Abigaile Pittman said yes. <br /> 36 Commissioner Pelissier asked if there is a determined process for identifying different <br /> 37 stakeholders. <br /> 38 Abigaile Pittman said all names will be brought to the BOCC, with OUTBoard <br /> 39 recommendations noted, for final choosing and appointment. <br /> 40 Abigaile Pittman said various organizations will be invited to apply. <br /> 41 Commissioner Price referred to section A.2.f of the proposed resolution and said there <br /> 42 are two Chambers of Commerce. She suggested changing the wording to "2" from chambers, <br /> 43 and keep residents at 5. <br /> 44 Commissioner Dorosin said he read A.2.f as an "or" option, and suggested leaving it as <br /> 45 "County business" which could mean with the Chamber or not. <br /> 46 Commissioner Price said it may be beneficial to have representatives from both of the <br /> 47 Chambers. <br /> 48 Commissioner Rich said she would not want to reduce the number of Orange County <br /> 49 residents, preferring to keep it at six. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.