Browse
Search
Minutes 02-18-2016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Minutes 02-18-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2016 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:21:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/2016
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - C1 Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment - Mailed Notifications
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - C2 - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - E1 - Review of Minimum Lot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
ORD-2016-006 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development to modify mailed notifications
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
ORD-2016-007 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development to adopt new regulations for the permitting of temporary health care structures
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> D. ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING <br /> The public hearing was adjourned at 7:26 p.m. <br /> E. WORK SESSION <br /> 1. Review of Minimum Lot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions —To review <br /> and discuss the County's subdivision development and review processes focusing <br /> primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the clustering of <br /> proposed subdivision lots. <br /> David Stancil, Department of the Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation <br /> (DEAPR) Director provided background regarding the Rural Character Study. He said in 1987, <br /> the BOCC created a Joint Planning Area with the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said <br /> part of this Joint Planning Area was the designation of the Rural Buffer. He said the mechanism <br /> to implement this rural buffer was the implementation of the two-acre minimum lot size. He said <br /> a study committee was created to consider how best to protect the rural integrity of the land. He <br /> said the first area focused on the rural buffer, and the second area focused on the remaining <br /> rural areas of the County. He said, simply put, the conclusion was to create a sliding scale <br /> between open space and the ability to achieve a smaller lot size. He said a great deal of <br /> thought went into the decisions and the process was a high point in his time in Orange County. <br /> Craig Benedict said Orange County's population has increased by about 50,000 people <br /> since the rural character study was completed. He said the majority of these people went into <br /> the cities but about 45% went into the unincorporated area. He said the original goals of the <br /> study started out as an open space preservation plan, balancing agricultural protection. He said <br /> the interesting part of this report is that, in large part, cooperation with the plan was voluntary. <br /> He said developers would submit two plans: a conventional one (10 acres, divided into five 2- <br /> acre lots), and a flexible plan (10 acres, with five 1-acre lots, and five acres of open space). He <br /> said the plans were reviewed, and the decision of which plan to use was placed on the <br /> developer. He said initially the majority of developers chose the conventional plans but slowly <br /> moved towards flexible plans. He said the process moved from voluntary to being a bit more <br /> direct, in order to achieve the outlined goals. <br /> Craig Benedict said the conversation now shifts to the next 50,000 people moving into <br /> Orange County and considering where they will live. He said projections are for lots of single- <br /> family development to occur in the rural buffer due to demand. He said one of the goals from <br /> the rural character study that remains in place today is the growth management goal: to have <br /> urban growth boundaries; to have efficient forms of development; balance the natural resource <br /> goals with pattern development and growth management. <br /> Commissioner Rich said there was previous discussion about the gross overstatement <br /> of projected population growth. She asked if there was an update on these numbers. <br /> Craig Benedict said the original numbers were done for the entire triangle region. He <br /> said he will give a presentation on March 2 to Planning Board about how these numbers were <br /> developed for the 2040 plan. He said the 2045 plan is currently being worked on and it is hoped <br /> that the control totals, which are provided to the County, can be reviewed and more appropriate <br /> estimates garnered. He said the formula for the projections (one house per every two acres), <br /> cannot be altered, but the numbers can be reviewed for realistic estimates. <br /> Michael Harvey, Orange County Current Planning, reviewed the following background <br /> and PowerPoint slides: <br /> PURPOSE: To review and discuss the County's subdivision development and review <br /> processes focusing primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the <br /> clustering of subdivision lots. This item was developed to address a petition submitted by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.