Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
17 <br /> A law will never give me the right to do what is wrong. So you mean to tell me if someone <br /> breaks in my house between the hours of 6 PM and 10 AM I cannot pull the trigger to protect <br /> my family because I might disturb someone else down the road picking flowers in her garden. <br /> My Second Amendment protects me from any of the Unlawful discriminating laws Orange <br /> County might be trying to write and pass. People have bled and died in order to protect this <br /> right that you selfishly and cowardly here are trying to take away. I pay taxes. Stay the hell off <br /> my land and stay out of my personal business ...this should not be hard for you to do nor <br /> understand which you protect and stand for the killing of 4000 innocent children each and <br /> every day in their mothers womb while screaming stay out of their vagina. <br /> I paid for this land you didn't. I pay taxes to help you pay for yours. <br /> Rodney Davis <br /> Efland, NC <br /> Proud law-abiding tax payer and gun owner <br /> Another unenforceable, unneeded regulation to stifle the rights of the people. I never cease to <br /> be amazed at the worthless drivel that springs forth from those who believe their election gives <br /> them God like powers to dictate how others should conduct their daily activities. <br /> Orange County was once a good place to live but now it has become an over regulated and <br /> over taxed suburb of Chapel Hill. <br /> The time has come to say enough is enough. I am vehemently opposed to this proposed <br /> intrusion on my rights as a property owner. I do not need you to tell me how to conduct myself <br /> responsibly on my property regarding the discharge of firearms. <br /> Harold Dorsett <br /> Dear Orange County Commissioners, <br /> I am writing in regard to a current proposed Amendment, "Regulating the Discharge of <br /> Firearms." Foremost and frankly, as a property owner and taxpayer in Orange County, I <br /> strongly oppose this amendment on virtually all aspects, and for good reasoning. As an avid <br /> shooter and sportsman I see this amendment as unnecessary, over reaching, and <br /> unwarranted in many ways. <br /> First, let me say that I am all for firearm safety and the practices of safe shooting. Any person <br /> who pick-ups a firearm, in my opinion, has immediately signed a binding contract that requires <br /> them to protect the safety of everyone and everything around them. <br /> To address this amendment, again I repeat, that I am strongly opposed, and for good <br /> reasoning. The requirements of this amendment will burden a large majority of shooters with its <br /> extremely cumbersome conditions. The amount of land required, under the approval of this <br /> amendment, will automatically prevent many from being able to shoot regularly on their own <br /> property, again their own property. Property that a person has worked hard for, paid taxes on, <br /> and incurred many types of expenses to maintain. That, to me, is overly restrictive. <br />