Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> 1 He said the ingredients of housing costs are: land, public or private infrastructure, entitlements <br /> 2 in permit fees, cost of housing, cost of labor, profit margins, and market aspects. He said the <br /> 3 areas, which can be affected and changed, are being considered. <br /> 4 Commissioner Dorosin said he would love to hear on going updates from the multi- <br /> 5 department effort. <br /> 6 Commissioner Rich said when the BOCC approved the development of Whitfield the <br /> 7 developer made voluntary contributions to affordable housing. She said the idea of affordable <br /> 8 housing in the rural part of the County should be considered as well as who is being served by <br /> 9 the affordable housing. <br /> 10 Craig Benedict said staff has reviewed the inventory of affordable housing in the rural <br /> 11 parts of the County. He said a comprehensive picture will be presented to the BOCC. <br /> 12 Chair McKee suggested breaking affordable housing into two sections: low income <br /> 13 affordable housing (Community Home Trust, Habitat, etc.); and work force affordable housing <br /> 14 ($125,000 to $150,000 homes). <br /> 15 Michael Harvey said looking at the comprehensive plan and the land use map, high <br /> 16 intensity housing, in the 10 to 20 year transitions, is the highway 70 corridor, certain areas near <br /> 17 Hillsborough and Durham, and some areas of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said it is clustered <br /> 18 in these areas as the services are located there as well. <br /> 19 Chair McKee asked if alternative water and sewer systems are being considered, can <br /> 20 work force affordable housing be offered outside these high dollar areas just mentioned by <br /> 21 Michael Harvey. <br /> 22 Michael Harvey said one of the rationales for recommending a rural residential master <br /> 23 plan development process is to allow that type of dialogue to occur. He said it is important to <br /> 24 remember that there are some intrinsic limits to such a dialogue, based on a density discussion <br /> 25 that must occur at another work session. He said the village concept is a possibility if the <br /> 26 infrastructure obstacles can be overcome. <br /> 27 Chair McKee said some smaller local builders may be attracted to these options. <br /> 28 Commissioner Jacobs said this discussion occurred at the BOCC retreat three years ago <br /> 29 and the idea of clustered development with on-site community systems was considered. He <br /> 30 said it is time to move past discussion and to try something. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price said she would like to try the cluster developments with a small <br /> 32 number of homes. She said those of modest income, who wish to live in a rural setting, should <br /> 33 be able to do so. <br /> 34 Commissioner Rich referred to the map on page 77 and asked if Michael Harvey could <br /> 35 clarify the dark grey areas. <br /> 36 Michael Harvey said these are transition areas that are managed, from a zoning <br /> 37 standpoint, by either Chapel Hill or Carrboro. He said the County has granted authority for <br /> 38 those areas to be developed in accordance with the joint planning land use planning agreement. <br /> 39 Commissioner Rich referred to the triangle on the bottom of the map, which is identified <br /> 40 as rural buffer. She asked if there is a reason this portion of land is considered as such. <br /> 41 Michael Harvey said that goes back to the joint planning land use planning agreement. <br /> 42 He said the area was rural in nature, with lots of farms. <br /> 43 Chair McKee recalled the discussion about the extension of the water line for fire <br /> 44 protection in that area. <br /> 45 Commissioner Rich said this triangular area seems out of character given that Chatham <br /> 46 County is developing right up to the edge of it. <br /> 47 Craig Benedict said it is known as the "lost triangle". <br /> 48 Michael Harvey said based on this work session, the BOCC desires a presentation <br /> 49 regarding how the options discussed this evening will look and a future work session on density. <br /> 50 Commissioner Jacobs said he hoped this discussion would include tax implications of <br /> 51 the various possibilities. <br />