Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-22-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 03-22-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-22-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2016 12:31:45 PM
Creation date
3/18/2016 12:29:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/22/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-22-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> 1 D. ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING <br /> 2 <br /> 3 The public hearing was adjourned at 7:26 p.m. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 E. WORK SESSION <br /> 6 1. Review of Minimum Lot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions —To review <br /> 7 and discuss the County's subdivision development and review processes focusing <br /> 8 primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the clustering of <br /> 9 proposed subdivision lots. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 David Stancil, Department of the Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation <br /> 12 (DEAPR) Director provided background regarding the Rural Character Study. He said in 1987, <br /> 13 the BOCC created a Joint Planning Area with the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said <br /> 14 part of this Joint Planning Area was the designation of the Rural Buffer. He said the mechanism <br /> 15 to implement this rural buffer was the implementation of the two-acre minimum lot size. He said <br /> 16 a study committee was created to consider how best to protect the rural integrity of the land. He <br /> 17 said the first area focused on the rural buffer, and the second area focused on the remaining <br /> 18 rural areas of the County. He said, simply put, the conclusion was to create a sliding scale <br /> 19 between open space and the ability to achieve a smaller lot size. He said a great deal of <br /> 20 thought went into the decisions and the process was a high point in his time in Orange County. <br /> 21 Craig Benedict said Orange County's population has increased by about 50,000 people <br /> 22 since the rural character study was completed. He said the majority of these people went into <br /> 23 the cities but about 45% went into the unincorporated area. He said the original goals of the <br /> 24 study started out as an open space preservation plan, balancing agricultural protection. He said <br /> 25 the interesting part of this report is that, in large part, cooperation with the plan was voluntary. <br /> 26 He said developers would submit two plans: a conventional one (10 acres, divided into five 2- <br /> 27 acre lots), and a flexible plan (10 acres, with five 1-acre lots, and five acres of open space). He <br /> 28 said the plans were reviewed, and the decision of which plan to use was placed on the <br /> 29 developer. He said initially the majority of developers chose the conventional plans but slowly <br /> 30 moved towards flexible plans. He said the process moved from voluntary to being a bit more <br /> 31 direct, in order to achieve the outlined goals. <br /> 32 Craig Benedict said the conversation now shifts to the next 50,000 people moving into <br /> 33 Orange County and considering where they will live. He said projections are for lots of single- <br /> 34 family development to occur in the rural buffer due to demand. He said one of the goals from <br /> 35 the rural character study that remains in place today is the growth management goal: to have <br /> 36 urban growth boundaries; to have efficient forms of development; balance the natural resource <br /> 37 goals with pattern development and growth management. <br /> 38 Commissioner Rich said there was previous discussion about the gross overstatement <br /> 39 of projected population growth. She asked if there was an update on these numbers. <br /> 40 Craig Benedict said the original numbers were done for the entire triangle region. He <br /> 41 said he will give a presentation on March 2 to Planning Board about how these numbers were <br /> 42 developed for the 2040 plan. He said the 2045 plan is currently being worked on and it is hoped <br /> 43 that the control totals, which are provided to the County, can be reviewed and more appropriate <br /> 44 estimates garnered. He said the formula for the projections (one house per every two acres), <br /> 45 cannot be altered, but the numbers can be reviewed for realistic estimates. <br /> 46 Michael Harvey, Orange County Current Planning, reviewed the following background <br /> 47 and PowerPoint slides: <br /> 48 <br /> 49 PURPOSE: To review and discuss the County's subdivision development and review <br /> 50 processes focusing primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the <br /> 51 clustering of subdivision lots. This item was developed to address a petition submitted by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.