Browse
Search
2016-188-E Solid Waste - SCS Engineers, PC for preparation of Solid Waste Financial Plan
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2010's
>
2016
>
2016-188-E Solid Waste - SCS Engineers, PC for preparation of Solid Waste Financial Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2018 9:38:06 AM
Creation date
3/18/2016 10:53:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
3/7/2016
Contract Starting Date
3/7/2016
Contract Document Type
Agreement - Consulting
Amount
$89,999.00
Document Relationships
2017-109-E SW - SCS Engineers, PC - Consent to void earlier contract
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
2017-347-E SW - SCS Engineers for Consulting Services Scope of Services Performed
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
2018-010-E Solid Waste - SCS Engineering Professional Consulting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2018
R 2016-188-E SW - SCS Engineers, PC for preparation of Solid Waste Financial Plan
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\Contract Routing Sheets\Routing Sheets\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID:8A735669-3D2F-468A-BF99-3DF97688146A <br /> Proposal for Preparation of a Solid Waste Financial Plan <br /> The process of allocating the revenue requirement is simply a matter of seeking to identify the <br /> cause and effect relationship between various types of cost, and the activities and use of <br /> resources that cause those costs to be incurred. Those activities and use of resources that cause <br /> cost to be incurred are cost drivers. For example, the waste quantities collected is the cost driver <br /> for disposal expense. <br /> Direct costs are those types of cost which can be obviously and directly associated with a <br /> particular type of service. Facility wages and disposal expenses are examples of direct costs <br /> because they can often be attributable to a particular type of service. For example, the wages <br /> paid to operators of these facilities can be readily assigned to those customers. The disposal <br /> expense incurred when those waste quantities are sent to their ultimate disposal point can also be <br /> readily assigned to customers. <br /> However, this cause and effect relationship is not always obvious for all types of cost. Indirect <br /> costs are those types of costs that are shared among different types of operations and are not <br /> readily linked to a particular type of service. Examples of indirect costs include overhead such <br /> as building rents, utilities, management salaries, and allocation of cost from other departments. <br /> The process of allocating the revenue requirements by SCS is typically a two-step process. First, <br /> we assign direct costs to each customer sector based on the appropriate cost driver for each type <br /> of cost. Second, the remaining indirect costs are assigned to each customer sector based on each <br /> sector's proportionate amount of direct costs. For each customer sector, the combination of <br /> direct and indirect costs comprises the revenue requirement. <br /> Once the preceding steps are completed, SCS will finalize the Pro Forma Model. SCS will then <br /> work with the Department to utilize the Pro Forma Model,which will be constructed <br /> specifically for this project, to construct a series of sensitivity analyses to evaluate the fund <br /> balance implications of various critical parameters such as changes to the consumer price index <br /> (CPI), fuel costs, changes in State laws, changes in population, cash versus debt financing, and <br /> alternative levels of services at the Department facilities, etc. Exhibit 5 presents examples of <br /> alternative scenario outputs from completed SCS assignments. <br /> Exhibit 5. Examples of Types of Scenario Outputs From SCS <br /> Assignments <br /> COMPARISON OF ENDING FUND BALANCES WITH RATE SCENARIOS <br /> W $6,000,000 <br /> Z $4,000,000 No Rate change <br /> Q $2,000,000 CPI Adjustment <br /> Z $0 <br /> _ 10.4%Annual Adjustment+Cash Vehicle <br /> U_ FY2T" w° X12009 f Y2010 FY2011 Financing <br /> Z <br /> -10.4%Annual Adjustment+Loan Vehicle <br /> G ($4,000,000) Financing <br /> Z <br /> W ($6,000,000) <br /> FISCAL YEAR <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.