Orange County NC Website
transportation planning agencies and service providers in Orange County and the Triangle <br /> region. The resulting intermodal transportation system should reflect regional goals and <br /> objectives to meet projected travel demand and to reduce congestion and reliance on single <br /> occupancy vehicles. <br /> Objective T-4.2: (Ongoing) <br /> Plan and integrate the County's multi-modal transportation routes and services with regional <br /> transportation agencies and transit service providers, agencies and transit providers in <br /> neighboring counties, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Amtrak, and the North <br /> Carolina Railroad. <br /> Objective T-4.3: (Long Term) <br /> Revive rail transportation in Orange County and the Triangle region. <br /> General Note to Reader: This proposed revision does not include the references to other plan <br /> elements, nor does it evaluate the proposed timelines. <br /> Chair Jacobs made reference to page 9-5 and the listing of the countywide road <br /> network, which does not mention 15/501. He made reference to page 9-9, line 5; 9-13, line 32; <br /> and 9-14, line 19 and said that all of the discussions about the bicycle plan are inconsistent. <br /> The Board discussed this recently that the OUT Board is recommending bicycle priorities that <br /> are totally inconsistent with the adopted bicycle plan, which is a commuter work bicycle plan, <br /> and most of the biking mentioned by the OUT Board is recreational. He said that the Board <br /> voted to revisit this. This is also referred to on page 9-20, line 46. <br /> Chair Jacobs thanked the Planning Board members present and asked them to thank <br /> their colleagues for all of their work. <br /> Chair Jacobs asked Tom Altieri to make a separate table for what was discussed tonight <br /> instead of including it in the existing table. <br /> The Board will vote on this at the next meeting that it comes to the Board in November. <br /> 2. Lands Legacy Action Plan for FY 2008-10 <br /> Environment and Resource Conservation Director Dave Stancil said that this is <br /> something that is done every two years in the fall — bring back a draft action plan for the next <br /> two fiscal years. The purpose is to hear from the County Commissioners about the priorities <br /> that have been identified by the staff and advisory boards. He noted that staff is very conscious <br /> of what has been going on in the global economy in the last few months. The plan is to fund the <br /> document with the existing resources. He said that the purpose of the action plan is to make <br /> the priorities operational during the two-year period and the five different categories that Lands <br /> Legacy operates—farmland, natural areas, wildlife habitat and prime forests, watershed riparian <br /> buffers, future parks and open space, and cultural resources lands. <br /> There has been a lot of work to have a large amount of information to pull from. At the <br /> earlier part of the decade, there was an effort to create a "green print." He showed a map with <br /> important areas in the County and surrounding areas. The document is consistent with the <br /> long-term plans that have been created over the years. <br /> Rich Shaw reviewed the contents of the document. He specifically went over the Priority <br /> List for July 2008-2010, which includes Bingham Township Park, farmland easements, Jordan <br /> Lake Macrosite, Seven Mile Creek Preserve, Upper Eno Riparian Buffers, Hall's Mill Historic <br /> Area, Crawford Mountain, Bolin Creek Corridor, Mountains to Sea Trail, Meadow Flats Natural <br /> Area, and Currie Hill Natural Area. He made reference to Appendix 2, which is the Potential <br /> Expansion of the Nature Preserves Concept. The idea is to protect strategic areas between <br />