Minutes - 20090210 Work Session - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

determined that inhalation or ingestion of this material is dangerous. High levels of lead were found in the older fields studied, which if inhaled or ingested can cause adverse health effects including developmental delay and behavior problems. The CDC also stated "The risk for harmful lead exposure is low from new fields with elevated lead levels in their turf fibers because the turf fibers are still intact and the lead is unlikely to be available for harmful exposures to occur." They also added that "At this time, CDC does not yet understand the potential risks associated with exposure to dust from worn artificial turf." The June 2008 CDC Health advisory does not recommend discontinued use of synthetic turf facilities, but instead recommends precautions for the field manager and the user. Alternative infill options have not been found. The use of recycled tire material appears to be standard in the industry. Each manufacturer claims that its product is "safe" and installations continue to occur all over the country. UNC recently replaced the turf on its Fetzer Field with a product containing recycled rubber tire infill. It seems likely that these products can be safely used with responsible management and with a commitment to replacement close to warranty expiration, which is typically 8-10 years. Continued use often occurs well beyond the expiration of manufacturers' warranty periods. It would seem prudent that testing should be undertaken at this point to determine whether the infill products or the turf itself is breaking down to the point that it might pose a health hazard. Replacement costs typically run about half of the cost of the original installation. Potential Benefits Showing Results from the 2001 Parks and Open Space Bond —As recently noted, the Soccer Superfund is one of the projects from the 2001 bond where funding remains unspent. A portion of the funds was allocated and has been spent on the West Ten fields. Using the remaining funds for the most viable project that is closest to shovel ready would benefit the soccer community. Possible Town Involvement - Either project would require full approvals and partnerships to some degree with the respective town. Possible Options for Remaining Soccer Superfund Money 1. Provide a Soccer Superfund Grant of $625,000 to the Town of Chapel Hill for the Cedar Falls project. The transfer of funds would not occur until the conditions of the grant application as determined by the BOCC were met. 2. Allocate $625,000 for the development of one or two synthetic surface soccer fields at Smith Middle School. Determine source(s) of additional funding required to complete the project. 3. Reserve remaining Soccer Superfund money for Twin Creeks or the next soccer project ready for development. Commissioner Nelson asked about a turf field versus a Bermuda field in terms of cost and Lori Taft said that a turf field would cost $850,000 and Bermuda would cost $500,000.