Browse
Search
Minutes - 20091013 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Minutes - 20091013 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2016 9:15:15 AM
Creation date
3/14/2016 9:13:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/13/2009
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-13-2009
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 10-13-2009
Agenda - 10-13-2009 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 10-13-2009
Agenda - 10-13-2009 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 10-13-2009
Agenda - 10-13-2009 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 10-13-2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Other potential joint or partnership activities that furthers needed knowledge or <br /> information regarding biosolids application. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked about the resources available if a task force were to be <br /> formed. She suggested making this a collaborative effort between the boards and <br /> commissions. She also asked about the outcomes of this forum with the "unbiased expert." <br /> She said that having a variety of speakers would provide different views. <br /> Frank Clifton said that an unbiased person would be a person who would have <br /> experience and knowledge and a broader view on this subject of water quality and the <br /> environment. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that they want to have people present, so he would like to <br /> invite comments from the public, so there should be some sort of facilitator. He would also like <br /> to invite debate. He said that it has already been the position of the County Commissioners of <br /> wanting more regulatory control over this issue, and he would like to have this discussed at this <br /> forum. He asked the County Attorney for suggestions about this. <br /> John Roberts said that he did look into the regulatory options and none are good <br /> options. He said that a local bill would not be possible, because it would be unconstitutional <br /> since the issue is one of health. A statewide bill is an option, which would grant local <br /> governments increased authority to regulate. There is some movement in the state to seek <br /> this. There is a statute that allows regional solid waste management authorities to regulate <br /> and manage sludge. There are only two regional solid waste management authorities in the <br /> state on the coast that regulate sludge. They only attempt to regulate it within the confines of <br /> their landfills. The final option would be litigation, and that is not really regulation. In this <br /> option, the County would sue the state for failing to adequately monitor the application of <br /> biosolids in Orange County. The two options that are most likely to succeed are showing the <br /> violation of the constitution of provisions that the state is required to follow and showing that <br /> the state is not adequately enforcing its own rules and regulations. He said that the state is <br /> currently looking at the Sludge Application Study of 2009 and whether current regulation of the <br /> land application of sludge adequately protects health and the environment. This report is due <br /> in 2010. His recommendation as far as regulation is that, if Orange County wants to seek <br /> partners to look for increased authority on a statewide basis, this could be started immediately. <br /> Also, the County could wait for the results of the study and see if the state does anything <br /> about it. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the forum and said that one of the things it is <br /> looking for is prioritized research needs. He said that the County is not spending all of the <br /> money on the study with UNC and he suggested using some of this money to looking into the <br /> research needs. <br /> Rosemary Summers said that there was $10,000 from the Health Department's budget <br /> that was encumbered for the research study, and none of it has been used because it was not <br /> an adequate amount to fund the research. <br /> Commissioner Hemminger said that she would be concerned that the forum would be <br /> preaching to the choir. She feels that the task force would be more productive. She thinks <br /> that the big questions are: Is it safe? Should we be doing it? What can we do about it? <br /> Chair Foushee said that the County Commissioners have tried to move forward twice <br /> legislatively and she sees the forum as educating more than just the County. She thinks that it <br /> would be hard to move forward with staffing a task force until there is an education piece. <br /> Frank Clifton said that a public forum could be well publicized. His big question is how <br /> much money the County Commissioners want to spend studying this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.