Agenda - 08-22-1994 - C-1 (a, b, c, d)

Browse Search

006 Adjustments proposed to move the zoning district boundaries to property lines are as follows: Current Proposed Township Tax Map.Block.Lot Acreafe Zonin¢ Zonin¢ Eno 5.25..90B 2.86 R-1 EDD Eno 5.25..91 1.79 R-1 EDD Eno 5.25..102 0.80 R-1 EDD Eno 5.25..102A 1.01 R-1 EDD Adjustments proposed to the development area boundaries described in the Economic Development Districts Design Manual (Article 6.29 of the Zoning Ordinance) are as follows: Current Proposed Development Development Township Tax Map-Block-Lot Acreaste Area Area Eno 5.25..90E 2.86 None Primary 7.18 Secondary Primary Eno 5.25..91 1.79 None Primary 5.21 Secondary Primary Eno 5.25..102 0.80 None Secondary Eno 5.25..102A 1.01 None Secondary Eno 5.25..103 0.76 Secondary Primary Eno 5.25..59 1.99 Secondary Primary Eno 5.25..54A 4.73 Secondary Primary Maps showing the affected properties and proposed boundary line changes are provided as attachments. Proposed Text Amendments. When the Board of Commissioners approved the Economic Development District proposals on March 2, 1994, changes or amendments to the Economic Development Districts proposals were discussed and continued to its March 15 meeting. Part of the discussion focused on a major policy question - Board of Commissioners review of economic development proposals. The Board of Commissioners approved a recommendation that proposals suggested by Commissioners Gordon and Inako be referred to the Planning Board for review with the understanding that the Planning Board would consider a variety of approval options;i.e.,Staff, Planning Board, and Commissioners. At its March 21, 1994 meeting, the Planning Board referred proposed amendments to the adopted Economic Development Districts to the Ordinance Review Committee. Proposed amendments were presented to the Ordinance Review Committee for review/discussion on March 29, 1994.Subsequent to that meeting,the report of the Ordinance Review Committee was presented to the Planning Board at its April 12 meeting. The proposals are summarized below,including all options considered by the Ordinance Review Committee. The proposals are presented in detail in the attached ordinance amendment proposal. • Special Use Permit: The first option involves amendments to Article 8 - Special Uses and Article 6.29 - Development Standards for Economic Development Districts of the Zoning Ordinance. Under this option, "minor developments" or those with building areas of less than 20,000 sq.ft. and which disturb less than 40,000 sq.ft. of land area would be approved by the Planning Staff. Projects which exceeded these thresholds would be considered "major developments" and must have a Special Use