Orange County NC Website
6 <br /> • Affordable Housing Advisory Board: Noah Oswald, Member <br /> Noah Oswald said Chair Barbee had another commitment and had to leave, but he said <br /> she did want to thank the Board of Commissioners for all that it has done, noting that the <br /> Affordable Housing Advisory Board is at full capacity, which allows for more productive <br /> meetings. He also expressed her thanks to the BOCC for including affordable housing as part <br /> of bond referendum. <br /> Noah Oswald said the draft plan submitted to the BOCC consists of three components: <br /> gather information, innovative solutions, and effective collaboration. He said he would like to <br /> give the BOCC and the public more information about the impact of affordable housing efforts. <br /> He said his Board has talked about property inventory, housing vouchers and barriers <br /> landlords face in offering affordable housing. He said there are a lot of units working toward <br /> affordable housing that can be coordinated to have a far greater impact on the issue. He said <br /> his Board is hoping to work more effectively with its sister boards and the non-profit <br /> community. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier expressed agreement with the goal of effective collaboration. <br /> She referred to the work plan and asked if the BOCC can attend the affordable housing bus <br /> tour. <br /> Noah Oswald said he was not part of the Board the last time this tour was conducted, <br /> but he would extend an invitation to the BOCC when the tour next occurs. <br /> • Agricultural Preservation Board (APB): Renee McPherson, Chair <br /> Renee McPherson thanked the BOCC for her appointment. <br /> Staff Member Peter Sandbeck said the APB had a good year and added 17 new farms <br /> this past year voluntarily. He said there is a total of 69 farms in the program now. He said the <br /> ordinance was tweaked to allow farms that are not in the present use program to be in the <br /> voluntary agricultural district program, and there is now have one farmer who is eligible. <br /> Issues: <br /> o Current Present Use program rules require that new owners or heirs of farmland must <br /> apply for Present Use status within a short period of time after the land transfer has <br /> taken place, or the option to enroll expires. Some farmers and property owners are not <br /> aware of this rule and are forced to wait the full four-year waiting period before they are <br /> able to participate in the Present Use program. Better education is needed to inform <br /> new owners of this requirement. <br /> o Efforts to keep farmland in agricultural producing and farmers in farming in the County <br /> depend partly on developing and maintaining local and regional markets for farm <br /> products. Nationally and regionally, direct-to-consumer sales of farm products appear <br /> to be plateauing or decreasing by some measures, such as sales at farmers markets <br /> and customer participation in CSAs. The APB would like to explore the possibility of <br /> forming a study group or task force to develop strategies for fostering local direct-to- <br /> consumer and regional sales opportunities for our farmers. <br /> o Nuisance lawsuits by neighboring property owners continue to be a problem for some <br /> farmers. Those who purchase property next to a pre-existing farm operation still have <br /> the ability to complain and sue based on farm smells and noise unless the farm is <br /> already enrolled in the VAD/EVAD program. <br /> Chair McKee said he thinks the tax office sends out notifications regarding Present Use <br /> status, but he would follow up. <br />