Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-08-1994 - VIII-Q
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 08-08-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 08-08-1994 - VIII-Q
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2016 11:44:02 AM
Creation date
3/1/2016 11:22:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/8/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-Q
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940808
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
30 <br /> indicating an appropriate area west of the <br /> road not to exceed 10 acres. Seconded by <br /> Burklin. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Waddell - felt there was sufficient <br /> information to make a recommendation) . <br /> Adjournment time was reached. <br /> MOTION: Reid moved to extend the meeting to complete the <br /> agenda. Seconded by Barrows. <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed. <br /> AGENDA ITEM #11: PLANNING BOARD ITEMS <br /> a. Fiscal Impact Analysis Methodology <br /> (The abstract and information provided for <br /> discussion are on file in the Planning <br /> Department. ) <br /> Barrows expressed concern that the statistics <br /> used were historical and that she did not think <br /> that they reflect the demographics of the <br /> population attracted to new subdivisions. She <br /> continued that, at the very least, they are <br /> misleading. She asked if some updated statistics <br /> could be gathered from some of the subdivisions <br /> being implemented now. When Collins responded <br /> that 1990 census data was used, Barrows <br /> indicated that she was not aware that the data <br /> were so current. <br /> Further discussion indicated the feeling that <br /> families with school age children were in older <br /> established subdivisions/neighborhoods rather <br /> than in newer subdivisions. <br /> Brown expressed concern with the use of averages <br /> in preparing the impact analyses. Waddell <br /> responded that he felt the only thing that could <br /> be done would be to use "averages" . <br /> Collins indicated that a "per capita" methodology <br /> was used in development of the residential <br /> template. If "built" subdivisions were analyzed, <br /> a "case study" approach would be used, and the <br /> data might reflect reality better. He stated <br /> that it is difficult to take an actual situation <br /> and apply it to something proposed. The "per <br /> capita" method is an accepted and widely used <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.