Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
28 <br /> Rosemond noted that her concerns were similar to <br /> Reid's regarding future uses. <br /> Waddell noted that one of the findings-of-fact <br /> states that "Normally, the maximum amount of land <br /> zoned AS at any location shall not exceed ten <br /> acres. " He continued that he did not find the <br /> reason of 'convenience' compelling and asked for <br /> a better understanding. Ms. Kalb responded that <br /> initially they had requested only one acre, and <br /> that they were encouraged to apply for the entire <br /> tract by a member of the Planning Staff. <br /> Boland also expressed concern with the rezoning <br /> of the entire 68 acres. <br /> The Board reviewed the findings-of-fact. <br /> Article 20.3.2a - 20.3.2e <br /> MOTION: Burklin moved acceptance of the Planning Staff's <br /> findings. Seconded by Barrows. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Brown - 20.3.2d - not convinced that <br /> this request promotes health, safety and the <br /> public welfare) . <br /> Article 4.2a <br /> MOTION: Walters moved acceptance of the Planning Staff's <br /> findings. Seconded by Reid. <br /> VOTE: <br /> Unanimous. <br /> Article 4.2b <br /> ( 1) <br /> MOTION: Barrows moved acceptance of the Planning Staff's <br /> findings. Seconded by Burklin. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> Article 4.2b (2) <br /> MOTION: Burklin moved acceptance of the Planning Staff's <br /> findings. Seconded by Hoecke. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> Article 4.2b (3) <br /> Hoecke asked who suggested to OWASA that the <br /> request be for the entire tract. Hinkley <br />