Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-08-1994 - VIII-M
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 08-08-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 08-08-1994 - VIII-M
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2016 11:14:19 AM
Creation date
3/1/2016 11:14:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/8/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-M
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940808
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
ORD-1994-013 Historic Preservation Ordinance Amendment to include procedures for reviewing proposed nominations to the National Register of Historic Places
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 1990-1999\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ju--02-1994 12:15 FROM ORANGE CTY COMMISSIONERS TO 3002 P•03 <br /> 3 <br /> 1 <br /> :L <br /> 2 A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by <br /> 3 Commissioner Inssko to refer the proposed text amendment to the Historic <br /> 4 Preservation Commission for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br /> 5 Commissioners no sooner than August 8, 1994. <br /> 6 VOTE: UNANMUS <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 3- 9 ]&M AT= TC ECON NIC D3 nWP1sE_NT_ D_I_SMUQT <br /> 10 a. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments ' <br /> 11 (1) Section 3.4 - Locational Criteria (Economic Development <br /> 12 Activity Nodes) <br /> 13 b. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> 14 (2) Article 4.2.19 - District Statements of Intent and <br /> 15 Application Criteria <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Marvin Collins presented for public comments additional <br /> 18 criteria by which to evaluate the location of Economic Development Activity <br /> 19 Nodes (Transition) . Page 31 of the agenda'list the proposal by Commissioner ' <br /> 20 Gordon and the recommendation of the Ordinance Review Committee. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 QUESTIONS/COlQKENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OR THE <br /> 23 PLANNING BOARD <br /> 24 Commissioner Gordon noted that she felt these economic <br /> development nodes should be located in areas which could be served with water <br /> and sewer and not in areas which are not provided these services. She would ', <br /> 27 like for the economic nodes to have the same criteria as industrial or ` <br /> 28 commercial nodes. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 THERE WERE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 MOTION <br /> 33 A motion was made by Commissioners Halkiotis, seconded by <br /> 34 Commissioner Insko to refer the proposed amendments to the Planning Board for <br /> 35 a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than S <br /> 36 August 8, 1994. <br /> 37 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 38 <br /> 39 <br /> 40 4. <br /> AKMMKIXTS BE7.M TO OPIM sPAQZ jQE=Q 0WT AREA PROPOSALS <br /> 41 a* Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments <br /> 42 (1) Section 4.1 - Overview of Implementation Strategies (Land <br /> 43 Use Element Categories/Zoning District Matrix (Open Space <br /> 44 Development Zoning District) ] <br /> 45 b. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> 46 (2) Article 4.2.6 Open Space Development (OSD) District <br /> 47 (2) Article 4.3 Permitted Use Table (Open Space Development <br /> 48 District) <br /> 49 (3) Article 5.1.1 - Dimensional Requirements for Residential <br /> Development (open Space Development District) <br /> (4) Article 6.30 - Development Standards for Open Space ' <br /> 52 Development (OSD) Districts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.