Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-30-1994 - C-1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 06-30-94 Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 06-30-1994 - C-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2016 8:46:13 AM
Creation date
3/1/2016 8:42:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/30/1994
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940630
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
04 <br /> A <br /> 2. Article 5.1.2 - Schedule for Non-Residential Development Lot-By-Lot Planned <br /> Development <br /> Same as #1 above except the minimum required lot size of two acres would be <br /> applied to nonresidential uses permitted in AR and R-1 zoning districts. <br /> 3. Article 6.2.4 - Density Averaging in AR and R-1 Districts <br /> A proposal concerning "density averaging" to allow developments to provide <br /> varying lot sizes so long as the overall density does not cxeed one dwelling unit <br /> per two acres(after excluding street rights-of-way)and no lot is less than 40,000 <br /> square feet in size. <br /> 4. Article 6.23.2 -Residential Densities <br /> A proposal to insure consistency with Protected Watershed Overlay Districts,e.g., <br /> the minimum lot size requirement in the Hyco Creek and Flat River watersheds <br /> are increased from 40,000 square feet to two acres. <br /> The area affected by the proposed amendments are shown on the attached map. Tracts <br /> and parcels located in watersheds with a minimum required lot size of two acres or larger <br /> would not be affected. <br /> A list of subdivisions with lots (or project densities) which not conform to the proposed <br /> two-acre standard and which have already been submitted for approval is provided Article <br /> 22 of the Zoning Ordinance defines a lot as being"created"at the time of Preliminary Plat <br /> approval in the case of a Major Subdivision,and Final Plat approval in the case of a Minor <br /> Subdivision. Unless the Board adopts a policy which allows the subdivisions to continue <br /> through the approval process, redesign to comply with the new standard(s) may be <br /> necessary.Such a policy was adopted at the time that the two-acre standard was put into <br /> plane in the Rural Buffer. <br /> R.ECON MW,NDATION: Applications for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and/or Zoning Ordinance <br /> by an individual or agency are treated in the same manner;e.g.,the public hearing <br /> is the time for the presentation of the Zoning Officer's analysis and <br /> recommendation.Such are also bound by the time limits contained in Article 20.7 <br /> of the Zoning Ordinance in terms of preparation of a Planning Board <br /> recommendation. <br /> Amendments initiated by the County, including amendments to the Zoning <br /> Ordinance text, are not bound by the same procedure. Although the Zoning <br /> Officer normally presents a recommendation in such cases, the only time <br /> limitations are those specified by the Board of Commissioners during the public <br /> hearing Process. <br /> Zoning Officer Recommendation <br /> As embodied in the proposed amendments, a'baseline"from which to implement <br /> rural character strategies is being presented for citizen comment. Thus, no <br /> recommendation is being presented by the Zoning Officer. <br /> Administration Recommendation <br /> The Administration recommends that the proposed amendments be referred to <br /> the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br /> Commissioners no sooner than August 8, 1994. The Administration further <br /> recommends that all recommended revisions to the proposals be reviewed by the <br /> County Attorney to insure compliance with statutory requirements concerning <br /> public hearing procedures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.