Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 02-16-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-16-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2016 9:19:22 AM
Creation date
2/11/2016 9:18:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-16-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 1 Chair McKee clarified that there can be incidental shooting on a property no more than <br /> 2 twice a month. <br /> 3 Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> 4 Chair McKee asked if enforceability is realistic, given that people hunt or may just fire <br /> 5 guns randomly. <br /> 6 Michael Harvey said there must be a willing participant to submit a complaint and supply <br /> 7 enough specifics for the Sheriff or the Planning Department to follow up. He said if one is <br /> 8 hunting, then there is no land use violation. He said if one is engaging in incidental shooting in <br /> 9 excess of the twice monthly maximum, the County would speak with the property owner about <br /> 10 the zoning compliance process and establishing the appropriate backstop. <br /> 11 Chair McKee expressed concern about the safety of County staff, and agreed that law <br /> 12 enforcement should be involved with any type of follow up. <br /> 13 John Roberts referred back to Commissioner Dorosin's question about one shooting <br /> 14 randomly from one's porch. He said the County can ban such activity, but the County has <br /> 15 additional restrictions that it cannot interfere with, such as hunting. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that John Roberts is advising that the BOCC could <br /> 17 adopt regulatory general ordinances, and enforcement would be separate. He said he would <br /> 18 be interested in developing this and looking at some different alternatives. <br /> 19 Michael Harvey said from a land use standpoint there is case law addressing what the <br /> 20 County can and cannot do. He said the idea being discussed is the adoption of a police power <br /> 21 regulation which is enforced by the Sheriff's office. He said the proposed amendment is a <br /> 22 reasonable regulatory standard that could be enforced. He said determining who does the <br /> 23 enforcement is the issue at hand. <br /> 24 Chair McKee asked if there is a technical procedure to remove part of the amendment <br /> 25 and pass the rest of the recommendation. <br /> 26 John Roberts said yes, the Board must be clear in what is being removed and can then <br /> 27 pass the rest of the ordinance as recommended. <br /> 28 Michael Harvey said shooting regulations are contained on page 43 of the text <br /> 29 amendment, in section 5.7.1 a2a. He said this is for private recreational activity. He said <br /> 30 regulatory requirements on recreational facilities are found page 45, and regulations governing <br /> 31 shooting ranges are found on page 46. <br /> 32 Michael Harvey said a commercial shooting range is only allowed with the issuance of a <br /> 33 SUP, where the applicant has the burden to provide competent material evidence and sworn <br /> 34 testimony to prove they meet with the standards of the UDO. <br /> 35 Commissioner Dorosin said he would prefer not to carelessly pull items out of the <br /> 36 proposed amendment, and is willing to have staff to review and bring it back in February. <br /> 37 Michael Harvey said the BOCC could approve the Statement of Consistency as <br /> 38 contained in Attachment 8, and then approve the Ordinance amendment revised as Attachment <br /> 39 9 by eliminating the provisions dealing with private recreational shooting facility regulations or <br /> 40 eliminating both private and the recreational provisions. <br /> 41 Commissioner Dorosin asked if eliminating a portion will remove the ability to regulate <br /> 42 one who wants to set up a shooting range. <br /> 43 Michael Harvey said he recommends keeping the commercial portion intact and to <br /> 44 eliminate the private recreational portion, having the County Attorney bring that back in a future <br /> 45 amendment packet to go into the general code of ordinances. <br /> 46 John Roberts said he would recommend removing section 5.7.1 a2a found on page 43. <br /> 47 Michael Harvey said he has no problem removing this. <br /> 48 Chair McKee asked if the Board chooses to do this is, it then able to discuss putting it <br /> 49 into general ordinances and also to incorporate the language from Lenoir County. <br /> 50 John Roberts said he can work on this for the February meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.