Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - E1 - Review of Minimum Lot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - E1 - Review of Minimum Lot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2016 10:38:52 AM
Creation date
2/4/2016 10:30:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/2016
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
E1
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-18-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
63 <br /> i. The combination or recombination of previously subdivided property if the <br /> number of lots are not increased and other provisions of local regulations <br /> are adhered to (i.e. minimum lot area and width, etc.), <br /> ii. A division of land into parcels greater than 10 acres in area, <br /> iii. Public acquisition by purchase of strips of land for widening or opening <br /> streets, <br /> iv. Division of a tract of land in single ownership where the property is no <br /> greater than 2 acres in area into not more than 3 lots if no street right-of- <br /> way dedication is involved and resultant lots are equal to or exceed County <br /> regulations (i.e. minimum lot area and width, etc.). <br /> Exempt subdivisions are reviewed by staff, who are responsible for determining if the <br /> proposal complies with applicable standards and can be classified as an `exempt' <br /> subdivision. If it can be classified as such, staff signs a statement attesting to this fact <br /> and our review ends. <br /> Lots created through the exempt subdivision process are still required to meet applicable <br /> development standards (i.e. minimum lot size, lot width, etc.) in order for a zoning <br /> compliance permit authorizing development to be issued. <br /> b. Minor Subdivision: a division of land proposing 1 to 5 individual parcels of property. <br /> Such projects are reviewed and acted upon by staff in accordance with Section 2.14 of <br /> the UDO. There is no board review (i.e. BOCC or Planning Board) required for a minor <br /> subdivision and such projects are required to adhere to applicable standards as detailed <br /> in Article 7 of the UDO. <br /> c. Major Subdivision: a division of land proposing 6 or more individual parcels of property. <br /> Such projects are reviewed in accordance with Section 2.15 of the UDO and are, <br /> ultimately, acted upon by the BOCC with a recommendation made by the Planning <br /> Board. <br /> The required review process of major subdivision applications is directly related to the <br /> number of proposed lots as well the subject property's location as denoted on the Growth <br /> Management System Map1 (Attachment 2). These review thresholds are broken down <br /> as follows: <br /> i. Standard Major Subdivision: The division of a parcel of property, <br /> regardless of its location proposing 6 to 20 individual lots. <br /> ii. Major Subdivision, Class A Special Use2, Rural Designated: The division of <br /> a parcel of property in a Rural Designated area of the County, as denoted <br /> on the Growth Management System map, proposing 21 to 40 individual <br /> lots. <br /> iii. Major Subdivision, Class A Special Use2, Urban Designated: The division <br /> of a parcel of property in an Urban Designated area of the County, as <br /> denoted on the Growth Management System map, proposing 21 to 79 <br /> individual lots. <br /> The Growth Management System Map was adopted by the BOCC in 2003 as a means of providing additional clarification of <br /> required review/permitting processes for certain projects,including subdivisions. The Map was not intended to specifically <br /> identify and/or designate an area as being `urban' or`rural'in nature. <br /> 2 Such projects are processed through the Special Use Permitting process as detailed in Section 2.7 of the UDO. Applicants are <br /> required to demonstrate compliance with applicable SUP standards/guidelines as well as the standards contained in Section <br /> 5.17.6 and Article 7 Subdivisions of the UDO. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.