Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - C2 - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-18-2016 - C2 - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2016 2:03:05 PM
Creation date
2/4/2016 10:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/2016
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-18-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
ORD-2016-007 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development to adopt new regulations for the permitting of temporary health care structures
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 5. Public Hearings <br /> a. Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Related to Temporary Health <br /> Care Structures — Public Hearing Closure and Action (No Additional Comments <br /> Accepted) <br /> The Board considered receiving the Planning Board recommendation, closing the <br /> public hearing, and deciding accordingly and/or adopting the Statement of Consistency and <br /> the Ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) regarding temporary <br /> health care structures as recommended by the Planning Board and staff. <br /> Ashley Moncado, Orange County Planning and Inspections, said this item was <br /> presented at the May Quarterly Public Hearing (QPH). She said no modifications were made <br /> after the QPH. She said the amendment was presented at the June Planning Board Meeting, <br /> and the Planning Board voted 10-2 to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency; <br /> and 9-3 to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. She said all comments from the <br /> Planning Board meeting can be found on page 8 within attachment 2. <br /> Commissioner Price asked if there had been any collaboration with the municipalities. <br /> Ashley Moncado said the Town of Hillsborough is pursuing an amendment to <br /> implement the session law, and there have been no comments from the other jurisdictions <br /> despite notification of the proposed amendment being sent to them. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Burroughs to <br /> close the public hearing. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he will vote against it. He said he knows it is a directive <br /> from the State, but he finds it a poor way to do policy. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said at the last BOCC meeting, the Commissioners had <br /> discussed about developing something specific to Orange County with broader parameters, <br /> and he encouraged the Board to pursue this. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said the Board needs to re-visit the policy that no more than 3 <br /> unrelated persons can live together as this could be a violation of civil rights, and asked if staff <br /> could revise this. <br /> Ashley Moncado said staff is interested in pursuing these changes as well, but needed <br /> to get this text amendment done first and then review changes to it. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin asked what would happen if the Board rejected this law. <br /> Ashley Moncado said the State law would trump County law. She said she spoke with <br /> the County Attorney's office regarding modifying the language, and changes will be pursued. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said it does not matter if the Board passes this amendment. <br /> Ashley Moncado said that is correct. She said the State law would trump the County's <br /> refusal to pass it, but potential future changes could make the amendment more flexible and <br /> accommodating. <br /> Commissioner Price said she has concerns with the residency requirement. She asked <br /> if there is a definition of, or process, to determine who is a resident. <br /> Ashley Moncado said this was a concern with the planning board members as well, and <br /> staff knows that this needs to be explored more thoroughly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.