Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-23-2007-6e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 10-23-2007
>
Agenda - 10-23-2007-6e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:51:05 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:55:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/23/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20071023
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
RES-2007-080 Endorsing Comments to DCHC MPO TAC Regarding Regional Priority List for 2009-2015 MTIP
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.21 <br />The MPO will provide local jurisdictions a base map of environmental areas. Local jurisdictions. <br />are asked to apply the ranking methodology based on a GIS analysis: <br />Community Impacts -Points are awarded based on the impact on neighborhoods and <br />communities. <br />Local jurisdictions are asked to apply the ranking methodology based on a GIS analysis. <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The order of transit priorities could vary significantly from year to year if anticipated funding sources are <br />reduced or eliminated by Congress. <br />• Mandates (e.g., the American's with Disabilities Act) may take precedence when programming <br />projects from the Regional Priority List in the TIP. <br />• The fiscal constraints of programming projects in the TIP may result in the programming of less <br />expensive, lower ranked projects. <br />• Some lower ranking projects maybe implemented earlier than a higher ranked, large project due to , <br />the time constraints associated with a more complex project (i.e., major investment studies, preparing <br />environmental documents, designing the project, right-of way acquisition, etc.). <br />• The significance of ranking more than 25 projects is minimal, at best due, to the availability of project <br />funds. <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.