Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-02-2016 - 5-c - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Motor Vehicle Sales Rental Land Uses - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 02-02-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-02-2016 - 5-c - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Motor Vehicle Sales Rental Land Uses - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2016 10:49:23 AM
Creation date
1/29/2016 10:25:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/2/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
2016-141 Statement of Consistency of Proposed UDO Text Amendment with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to revise existing regulations governing the display of vehicles at motor vehicle sale/rental businesses
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2016
Minutes 02-02-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
ORD-2016-005 Ordinance Amending the UDO to revise existing regulations governing the display of vehicles at motor vehicle sales/rental businesses
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 13 <br /> 1 Michael Harvey said the goal of the screened area is to provide a space for vehicles that <br /> 2 are not counted in the number of allowable allotment of vehicles displayed for sale per site. <br /> 3 Commissioner Rich asked if the building on page 36 is a person's home. <br /> 4 Michael Harvey said no, it is a commercial business with a residential property next <br /> 5 door. <br /> 6 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the idea behind this text amendment is that it is currently <br /> 7 too difficult to enforce the existing rules to keep people from parking in the right of way or <br /> 8 encroaching on neighboring properties. <br /> 9 Michael Harvey said no, the problem is two-fold: the first issue is that there is a feeling <br /> 10 that the 12-vehicle limit is too arduous; the second issue is to determine what number of <br /> 11 vehicles is acceptable. He said staff picked a number that it deemed reasonable which could be <br /> 12 more or less. He said a middle ground is being sought. He said it is also important to insure <br /> 13 some level of equity across zoning districts. <br /> 14 Commissioner Dorosin asked if a complaint came in regarding the number of cars in an <br /> 15 area, where is there is currently no regulation on the number of cars, is there an enforcement <br /> 16 mechanism by which the County can go out and address the concern. <br /> 17 Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> 18 Commissioner Dorosin asked if this is being done. <br /> 19 Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> 20 Commissioner Dorosin asked if it would be easier to have no vehicle limits across the <br /> 21 board and simply respond to concerns as they arise. <br /> 22 Michael Harvey said easy is a loaded word. He said this idea would help address the <br /> 23 equity issue and would be viewed as more reasonable. He said allowing a storage area for <br /> 24 vehicles, not included in the permitted amount of vehicles, would also help. He said he feels the <br /> 25 Board suggesting that the limit of 25 vehicles may not be viable. <br /> 26 Commissioner Dorosin said he is not so interested in the right number but rather <br /> 27 understanding the connection between the harms that are seeking to be addressed and this <br /> 28 means of addressing them. <br /> 29 Commissioner Dorosin asked if these regulations would only apply to commercial <br /> 30 businesses. He asked if he were to fix cars at his home, as a side business, would he be <br /> 31 subject to these regulations. <br /> 32 Michael Harvey said no he would not be subject to these regulations, with one caveat: <br /> 33 he said the goal is not to prevent people from selling a car, but there are prohibitions in the UDO <br /> 34 that prohibit one from engaging in an automotive repair business from one's property. Thus <br /> 35 working on one's own car is not an issue and selling a car on one's property is not an issue but <br /> 36 having 30 or 40 cars puts you into a questionably commercial establishment. <br /> 37 Commissioner Rich asked if there is currently a limit to the number of vehicles that may <br /> 38 be at one household. <br /> 39 Michael Harvey said no and the only prohibition is that junked vehicles cannot be stored <br /> 40 on one's property. <br /> 41 Commissioner Rich asked if one could have 10 cars parked in one's front yard. <br /> 42 Michael Harvey said yes, and he said that would not be a land issue, but rather a <br /> 43 general ordinance issue should the Board choose to address it. <br /> 44 Paul Guthrie asked if there is any distinction in existing zoning regulations between cars <br /> 45 for sale on site, cars stored on site for future sale and cars that are stored at another location, <br /> 46 but of the same ownership, waiting to be delivered to the original site or shipped out of state. <br /> 47 Michael Harvey said the only current regulation regarding display of vehicles is on NC <br /> 48 zoned 2 property, and that limit is 12 vehicles. He said if one is selling vehicles, one must be <br /> 49 appropriately zoned and display those vehicles consistent with an approved site plan. He said <br /> 50 this proposed ordinance memo will establish limits and allowances across the board in every <br /> 51 district where car sales are allowed. He said if one is storing vehicles off site, that property must <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.