Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-02-2016 - 5-c - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Motor Vehicle Sales Rental Land Uses - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 02-02-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 02-02-2016 - 5-c - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Motor Vehicle Sales Rental Land Uses - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2016 10:49:23 AM
Creation date
1/29/2016 10:25:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/2/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
2016-141 Statement of Consistency of Proposed UDO Text Amendment with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to revise existing regulations governing the display of vehicles at motor vehicle sale/rental businesses
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2016
Minutes 02-02-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
ORD-2016-005 Ordinance Amending the UDO to revise existing regulations governing the display of vehicles at motor vehicle sales/rental businesses
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 11 <br /> 1 Agenda Item: C-2 <br /> 2 Public Hearing-Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment <br /> 3 Display of Vehicles at Motor Vehicle Sales/rental Land Uses <br /> 4 Orange County Planning Department <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Background <br /> 7 • 2012 text amendment petition by local property owner limited display of cars to 12 within <br /> 8 Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) district, <br /> 9 • Staff has seen an increase in number of vehicles stored on sites throughout County, <br /> 10 • Believe there is room to increase number of allowable cars and require property <br /> 11 owner/applicant to definitively delineate car display areas on a site plan to avoid <br /> 12 confusion. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Proposal: <br /> 15 • Amend the UDO to base number of vehicles stored on property on acreage. <br /> 16 — Staff is recommending a limit of 25 cars per acre for property zoned Nc-2, EC-5, <br /> 17 E-I to address exiting issues. <br /> 18 — Staff is recommending a limit of 45 cars per acre for property in urbanizing areas. <br /> 19 • Require mandatory designation of vehicle display area, and <br /> 20 • Allow for incidental storage of additional vehicles so long as they are screened from <br /> 21 view. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Example (aerial photo) <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Staff Findings: <br /> 26 • Proposed amendments will create a distinction between vehicles displayed for sale and <br /> 27 stored for other purposes, <br /> 28 • Will help to address existing congestion at automotive sales operations, <br /> 29 • The proposal will create a necessary distinction between automotive sales/rental <br /> 30 businesses within urban and non-urban areas of the County, and <br /> 31 • Firms up language requiring display/storage areas to be properly delineated and <br /> 32 screened. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Recommendation: <br /> 35 Recommendation(s): The Planning Director recommends that the Board: <br /> 36 1. Receive the request, <br /> 37 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board <br /> 38 comments. <br /> 39 3. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be <br /> 40 returned to the BOCC in time for its February 2, 2016 regular meeting. <br /> 41 4. Adjourn the public hearing until February 2, 2016 in order to receive and accept <br /> 42 the Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Commissioner Dorosin referred to the aerial photo and asked if Michael Harvey could <br /> 45 please explain the difference between the shaded areas, the not shaded areas, and the red <br /> 46 area. <br /> 47 Michael Harvey said the aerial photo is of an existing site which attempts to show what <br /> 48 would be allowable. He said the shaded area would allow for the display of cars, the un-shaded <br /> 49 area would be for parking, and the red area would be where cars could be stored. <br /> 50 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the road could be pointed out in the photo. <br /> 51 Michael Harvey did so. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.