Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
34 <br />Developer Concerns At Churton Grove <br />32. Non Compliant Developer Sisnase Along St. Marv's Road <br />Is it the legal opinion of Orange County that the sign erected by Newland Communities at the entrance to Churton <br />Grove along St. Mary's Road, which sign contains 64 square feet of sign area (32 square feet times 2-sided sign), is <br />in compliance with all sections of Orange County Ordinances concerning Zoning and Signs (Chapter 50, Article <br />~? <br />33. Path Connections Between Braddock Park and Churton Grove <br />_a) What is Orange County's expectation regarding the incomplete path which runs along the path easement <br />originating at the intersection of Hadfield Street and Phase 2, Lot 92 heading roughly west toward Scotswood <br />Blvd? <br />b) Does Orange County have an expectation that Developer(s) will comply with Sec. 50-204(3)b3 of Orange <br />County Ordinances which requires that "walkways in the PD-H district shall form a logical...and convenient <br />system for pedestrian'access to all...project facilities and principal off-site pedestrian destinations?" <br />c) Does Orange County have a landscaping plan or other commitment from Developer(s) to dedicate a portion <br />along the eastern most boundary of the parcel with the legal description "COMMON-FUTURE BRA.DDOCK <br />PARK" (PIN #9874696944} toward the construction of a logical pedestrian tie in to the existing path located <br />between Lot 89 and Lot 94 of Churton Grove Phase Il? (For reference: There is, at present, a makeshift path <br />along this route. It is not paved and, unless included on a landscape plan, maybe encroached upon by an <br />eventual dwelling structure. The existing makeshift path is in a logical location for'pedestrian access between <br />. Churton Grove and Braddock Park.) <br />34. Voiding Special Use Permit. <br />In light of the actual and potential: code violations of Orange County Ordinances by Developer(s) and in light of <br />failure, to date, of Developer(s) to abide by all the conditions of the Special Use Permit, what is the legal~opinion of <br />Orange County regarding the severability of the Special Use Permit according to Condition 45 and Orange County <br />Zoning Ordinances specified in Sec. 50-194? <br />35. Approved Modifications Requiring Board Approval <br />a) ~To the extent that any of the aforementioned items of concern resulted in approved deviations from Orange <br />County Ordinances or approved modifications of the Special Use Permit, is it the legal opinion of Orange <br />County that such deviations and/or modifications are allowable without action by the approving board <br />according to Sec.50-237? <br />b) Please comment on any approved modifications (per code) regarding items of especially high homeowner <br />concern including, but are not limited to: <br />i) Safety . <br />(1) Crosswalks <br />(2) Sidewalks at Recreation Areas <br />(3) Split Rail Fence At Retaining Wall <br />ii) Amenities <br />(1) Condition 27 of the Special Use Permit, Items a - h <br />(2) Pool Capacity <br />iii) Phased Sequencing -Condition 37 of the Special Use Permit <br />iv) Path Easements <br />io <br />