Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
30 <br />Developer Concerns At Churton Grove <br />c) What remedy does Orange County propose if the county fmds that lack of any marked crosswalk across <br />Churton Grove Blvd is, in fact, an unsafe condition in violation of Orange County Ordinance 50-204(3)a2 <br />and/or Sec. 50-204(3)b3? <br />14. No Sidewalks On Active Recreation Area Parcel <br />a) Is it the legal opinion of Orange County that the lack of any'sidewalks on the parcel with the legal description <br />"LEASE AREA PH 2 CHURTON GROVE" (PIN #9875815631), which parcel contains the Active Recreation <br />Area (including basketball court, tennis court, swimming pool, and children's playground), is in accordance " <br />with Sec. 50-204(3)b3 of Orange County Ordinances which requires that "walkways in the PD-H district shall <br />. form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to all...project facilities...Walkways to be used <br />by substantial numbers of children as play areas or routes to school or other destinations shall be so located and <br />safeguarded as to minimize contacts with normal automotive traffic?" <br />b) What remedy does Orange County propose if the county finds that lack of any child accessible sidewalks near <br />the playground and recreation area is, in fact, not safe, logical, or convenient as required in Qrange County <br />ordinance 50-204(3)b3? <br />15. Split Rail Fence At Top of Retaining Wall Is A Safety Hazard <br />a) Is it the legal opinion of Orange County.that the split rail fence which sits atop a 7 to 10 foot high retaining wall <br />along the property line shared by Churton Grove (Phase II) and Braddock Park is in compliance with all <br />relevant safety ordinances? <br />c) To the extent the split rail fence is not in compliance with relevant ordinances, what are the expectations of <br />Orange County regarding Developer(s) requirement (method and timeline) to rectify the situation? <br />16. No Shade Provided at Tot Lot <br />a) Is it the legal opinion of Orange County that the tot lot located on the parcel with the legal description "LEASE <br />AREA PH 2 CHURTON GROVE" (PIN #9$75815631) is incompliance with the Special Use Permit <br />(Condition 27b) and Orange County Ordinance 46-79(b)4 both of which provide for shaded areas to be <br />constructed within the tot lot area'? <br />b) Is it the legal opinion of Orange County that Phase IV Development can continue per Condition 37 of the <br />Special Use Permit in light of the fact that this Phase II amenity has not yet been completed? <br />17. No Play Area for Elementary and Middle School Children Through Abe 14 <br />a) Is it the opinion of Orange County that the pre-kindergarten play structure located on the parcel with the legal <br />description "LEASE AREA PH 2 CHURTON GROVE" (PIN #9875815631) is in compliance with the Special <br />Use Permit (Condition 27b) which specifies "playground area with play apparatus for children, ages pre-school <br />to 14?" <br />b) Is it the legal opinion of Orange County that Phase IV Development can continue per Condition 37 of the <br />Special Use Permit in light of the fact that this Phase Il amenity has not yet been completed? <br />18. Pla round Includes Lumber With Carcinogenic Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA <br />a) Does Orange County have an opinion on the use of pressure treated lumber containing the cancer-causing <br />additive Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA} in lumber used in and around children's play areas? <br />b) Does Orange County have any policies surrounding the use of pressure treated lumber in light of the <br />Environmental Protection Agency's directive of December, 2003 prohibiting the use of CCA treated lumber in <br />residential applications, including children's playgrounds? <br /> <br />