Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> 1 Example (aerial photo) <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Staff Findings: <br /> 4 • Proposed amendments will create a distinction between vehicles displayed for sale and <br /> 5 stored for other purposes, <br /> 6 • Will help to address existing congestion at automotive sales operations, <br /> 7 • The proposal will create a necessary distinction between automotive sales/rental <br /> 8 businesses within urban and non-urban areas of the County, and <br /> 9 • Firms up language requiring display/storage areas to be properly delineated and <br /> 10 screened. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Recommendation: <br /> 13 Recommendation(s): The Planning Director recommends that the Board: <br /> 14 1. Receive the request, <br /> 15 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board <br /> 16 comments. <br /> 17 3. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be <br /> 18 returned to the BOCC in time for its February 2, 2016 regular meeting. <br /> 19 4. Adjourn the public hearing until February 2, 2016 in order to receive and accept <br /> 20 the Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Commissioner Dorosin referred to the aerial photo and asked if Michael Harvey could <br /> 23 please explain the difference between the shaded areas, the not shaded areas, and the red <br /> 24 area. <br /> 25 Michael Harvey said the aerial photo is of an existing site which attempts to show what <br /> 26 would be allowable. He said the shaded area would allow for the display of cars, the un-shaded <br /> 27 area would be for parking, and the red area would be where cars could be stored. <br /> 28 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the road could be pointed out in the photo. <br /> 29 Michael Harvey did so. <br /> 30 Michael Harvey said this photo is just a snap shot in time and there may be several <br /> 31 options that could meet the requirements. He said the black line on the photo does not indicate <br /> 32 a set back. <br /> 33 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the cars in the red area would count towards the 25-car <br /> 34 limit. <br /> 35 Michael Harvey said no. <br /> 36 Commissioner Rich said the image on page 32 looks like a lot more than 25 cars. <br /> 37 Michael Harvey said yes that is significantly more than 25 cars, which would not be <br /> 38 allowed under the proposed text amendment. <br /> 39 Michael Harvey said the only zoning district that has a limit on the number of cars that <br /> 40 can be displayed is the neighborhood commercial district. He said the example on page 32 is <br /> 41 currently acceptable and the proposed amendment would seek to avoid such examples. <br /> 42 Commissioner Rich asked if the proprietor of the site shown on page 32 knows about the <br /> 43 proposed amendment. <br /> 44 Michael Harvey said yes. <br /> 45 Chair McKee asked if there is a reason that the limit of land covered by vehicles is set at <br /> 46 20 percent. He said it would make more sense to him to have five car lots with 30 or 40 percent <br /> 47 coverage, rather than 15 car lots with 20 percent coverage. He said if there is a demand for a <br /> 48 certain number of cars, the need could be met by increasing the number of lots or increasing the <br /> 49 density on a smaller number of lots. <br /> 50 Michael Harvey said there must be a distinction between zoning designations in the <br /> 51 predominantly rural areas of the County versus the predominantly urban areas. He noted that <br />