Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-21-2016 - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Recreational Land Uses - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 01-21-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-21-2016 - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Recreational Land Uses - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2016 8:32:05 AM
Creation date
1/14/2016 4:01:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/21/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-21-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
ORD-2016-001 Ordinance amending the UDO revising existing regulations governing the development of recreational land uses
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> c. BOCC Updates/Checkpoints <br /> May 5, 2015 —Approval of UDO Amendment Outline Form <br /> July 1, 2015 — Planning Board Ordinance Review Committee (ORC) (BOCC <br /> receives materials) <br /> September 8, 2015 — Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> January 21, 2016 — Receive Planning Board Recommendation <br /> d. Other <br /> N/A <br /> 2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br /> Mission/Scope: Public Hearing process consistent with NC State Statutes and <br /> Orange County ordinance requirements <br /> a. Planning Board Review: <br /> July 1, 2015 — Ordinance Review Committee (ORC). The ORC reviewed this <br /> item at its July 1, 2015 meeting where the following comments/questions were <br /> made: <br /> • Could a resident, on his own property, sponsor a club in his name and <br /> finance play on the field under this proposal? <br /> STAFF COMMENT: As the Ordinance is currently written, and proposed, <br /> the property owner would have to get a special use permit as the <br /> proposed recreational land use is intended to serve the needs of the <br /> general public or members of a club/organization. <br /> • Could I develop a putting green on my property? <br /> STAFF COMMENT: You can have a recreational facility on your property <br /> and use it for recreational purposes, including a putting green. <br /> When a recreational amenity is opened up for public use/access, however, <br /> the nature of the use of property changes and becomes more than a <br /> simple accessory use. Staff argues it becomes a recreational facility used <br /> to satisfy the needs of the general public, which requires a heightened <br /> level of permit review to operate. <br /> • Could a farmer donate land to a non-profit organization to allow for the <br /> development of a recreational facility? <br /> STAFF COMMENT: Yes but they would have to obtain a Class B Special <br /> Use Permit for the use. This is the current requirement and we are not <br /> recommending a change to the existing process. <br /> • Is the intent with this regulation to control the development of gun ranges <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.