Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
28 <br /> Approved 12/2/15 <br /> 106 need to know it's certainly within your purview to say you want to see what the County Attorney does before we make <br /> 107 a recommendation. <br /> 108 <br /> 109 Peter Hallenbeck: I would like to go around the room and let everyone comment and then we can have some general <br /> 110 discussion. <br /> 111 <br /> 112 Buddy Hartley: I would like to see what the attorney decides. <br /> 113 <br /> 114 Paul Guthrie: I don't think we should be making a formal presentation until we have seen how it's being fitted out <br /> 115 through the rest of the county. <br /> 116 <br /> 117 James Lea: I too would like to hear what the attorney has to say. <br /> 118 <br /> 119 Maxecine Mitchell:We should just sit and wait to see what the attorney says. <br /> 120 <br /> 121 Lisa Stuckey: I agree with everybody else. <br /> 122 <br /> 123 Andrea Rohrbacher: I agree with everybody else. <br /> 124 <br /> 125 Tony Blake: Overall I agree with everybody else but I think what really needs to happen is they need to consider the <br /> 126 source of the complaint but let's hear what the attorney has to say first. <br /> 127 <br /> 128 Lydia Wegman: I agree with waiting for the attorney but I would like to have these set back requirements enforced in <br /> 129 some way. <br /> 130 <br /> 131 Peter Hallenbeck: I am a little concerned about the two incidents a month; I think that's too low for rural areas. I think <br /> 132 I would be more concerned that target practice happens during daylight hours than I would how many times it <br /> 133 happens. I like the simplification on page 34 that just says that the set-up is designed to keep the projectiles on the <br /> 134 property. I think that's something that gives the Sheriff some discretion. I would not be opposed to some setbacks in <br /> 135 regard to safety. I like the change on page 40, I think it strikes to the reason we are doing this. Meaning getting away <br /> 136 from the profit and non-profit and simply saying is this going on for compensation.We need a big picture with respect <br /> 137 to other agencies and how they work together because we keep running into this with planning ordinances. I would <br /> 138 now like to open up the floor for any more comment. <br /> 139 <br /> 140 Michael Harvey: It sounds to me like the board would rather not make a decision until it gets something definitive <br /> 141 from the County Attorney so my recommendation is that your motion be that this be continued to the December <br /> 142 regular meeting and that you ask the county commissioners to extend the public hearing to the first meeting in <br /> 143 January. <br /> 144 <br /> 145 MOTION made by Paul Guthrie to move continue item to December meeting and request the public hearing be the <br /> 146 first meeting in January. Buddy Hartley seconded. <br /> 147 VOTE: Unanimous <br /> 148 <br /> 149 Michael Harvey:Just as a heads up we are due to go before the Board of County Commissioners tomorrow night and <br /> 150 extend the public hearing so originally we asked it to be extended to the December 7th meeting,we will ask that it be <br /> 151 adjourned until the first meeting in January. <br /> 152 <br /> 153 Peter Hallenbeck:Are there any opposed? <br /> 154 <br /> 155 Peter Hallenbeck: Okay so it is a unanimous decision to wait and not deal with this statement of consistency tonight. <br /> 156 <br /> 3 <br />