Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-09-2007-6f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 10-09-2007
>
Agenda - 10-09-2007-6f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:44:28 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:50:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/9/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20071009
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 5 22 <br />52 with 148 acres of the total acreage in the pre-designated commercial area. <br />53 <br />54 Proposed Zoning text changes include adding sections of intent, application criteria, permitted uses, development <br />55 standards, access, outside storage limitations, prescribed architectural standards to preserve community and corridor <br />56 character, landscaping, signage, and parking. <br />57 <br />58 Amendments are also proposed to Section 6.23.3 of the Zoning Ordinance to increase the permitted Impervious <br />59 Surface Ratio (ISR) to 40% for non-residential uses in 10-year Transition areas, with structural BMPs if the ISR is <br />60 greater than 12%, if the parcel is located in the Upper Eno or Back Creek Protected Watershed. <br />61 <br />62 August 27, 2007 Public Hearing <br />63 <br />64 Because the proposed amendments affect the Zoning Atlas, notification letters to affected property owners were <br />65 required by State statutes and by County Ordinance. A total of 456 notification letters were mailed on August 10, <br />66 2007 to property owners of property in the proposed ECOD and to property owners within 500-feet of the proposed <br />67 ECOD boundary advising them of the proposal and inviting them to the August 27, 2007 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br />68 Approximately 20 citizens attended the public hearing regarding this item and three (3) citizens addressed the BOCC <br />69 and Planning Board regarding the proposal. Two (2) of the citizens had questions about how the proposal would <br />70 specifically affect their property. One (1) of the citizens cited concerns over existing traffic levels and how the <br />71 proposal might increase traffic. <br />72 <br />73 The proposed amendments are consistent with the recommendations contained in the adopted EMSAP. The <br />74 EMSAP Implementation Focus Group (IFG) was involved in drafting the proposed changes and IFG members have <br />75 reviewed the proposed amendments. A 2-page "Q & A"document that explains some of the details of the proposed <br />76 ECOD was included with the property owner notification letters and is included as Attachment 3. <br />77 <br />78 Post August 27, 2007 Public Hearing Amendments and Responses <br />79 <br />80 Staff has prepared responses to comments and questions made by BOCC and Planning Board members at the <br />81 Quarterly Public Hearing; this document is included as Attachment 4. Attachment 1 is the proposed Zoning <br />82 Ordinance text amendments with post-Quarterly Public Hearing text revisions in Section 6.25 shown in strike- <br />83 through/underline format (see pages 6-12 of the agenda abstract). <br />84 <br />85 FINANCIAt_ IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact. Staff time has been accounted for in the departmental <br />86 budget. <br />87 <br />88 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Board make a recommendation for <br />89 approval to be considered by the BOCC at the October 9, 2007 regular BOCC meeting. <br />90 <br />91 Brian Crawford: What were Commissioner's Jacobs' comments about fencing? <br />92 <br />93 Perdita Holtz: That the proposed prohibition regarding chain link fencing seemed overly restrictive to him. Our <br />94 ordinance at this time does not prohibit chain link fences in other areas of the county. We debated this issue among <br />95 staff after the Quarterly Public Hearing and we are recommending that vinyl coated chain link fence be allowed in the <br />96 pre-designated commercial area. <br />97 <br />98 Sam Lasris: Where would it be allowed? <br />99 <br />100 Perdita Holtz: It would be allowed in the dotted area on the map. Vinyl coated chain link fence generally comes in <br />101 black and green. <br />102 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.