Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-09-2007-6f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 10-09-2007
>
Agenda - 10-09-2007-6f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:44:28 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:50:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/9/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20071009
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 4 19 <br />Efland-Cheeks Highway.70 Corridor Zoning Overlay District (ECOD) <br />Staff Responses to Comments and Questions made by the <br />BOCC and Planning Board at the <br />August 27, 2007 Quarterly Public Hearing <br />1. Comment: Allowing non-residential uses along the entire corridor <br />introduces uncertainty. Why was a 40% limit on non-residential uses <br />along the corridor chosen? The effect on residential uses that remain <br />must be considered. <br />Staff Response: The Highway 70 corridor is located in a 10-Year <br />Transition area which is targeted for, and historically has been comprised <br />of, higher density and intensity of land uses. Indeed, the existing land use <br />pattern along the corridor is one of residential uses intermixed with a <br />variety of commercial uses.. Staff and the EMSAP Implementation Focus <br />Group (IFG) recognize that the proposed zoning overlay district will further <br />intermix residential and non-residential uses along the corridor. It has <br />been a desire of the IFG to allow individuals to work within the concept of <br />a free market economic system to choose locations viable for lower- <br />impact non-residential uses while mitigating the effect of those non- <br />residential uses on adjacent and nearby residential uses. Staff and the <br />IFG believe that the standards contained within the proposed ECOD <br />effectively mitigate impacts within an area of the county that is targeted for <br />small-scale economic development. <br />2. Comment: The restriction on chain link fencing seems overly restrictive. <br />Staff Response: Staff has evaluated this portion of the proposed text and <br />is recommending the following change: <br />- Within the pre-designated commercial area, vinyl-coated chain link <br />fencing would be permitted for non-residential uses. Outside of the <br />pre-designated commercial area but within the ECOD boundary, <br />chain link fencing for non-residential uses would not be allowed. <br />Our professional opinion is that wide-spread use of galvanized steel chain <br />link fencing detracts significantly from the visual aesthetics of an area and <br />could detract from the promotion of economic development investment by <br />low-impact businesses. Chain link fencing should not be permitted <br />outside of the pre-designated commercial area in order to promote and <br />protect the visual character of the corridor. Within the pre-designated <br />commercial area, we are recommending the potential use of vinyl-coated <br />chain link fencing in an attempt to balance aesthetic aspects with the <br />potential need for cost-effective fencing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.